9-01-06 VERSION
Professional Certification
IN ACTION
Gathering and Analyzing Quality Evidence
Facilitator’s Handbook
CD Featuring
Marilyn Simpson
It is intended that this process will be modified to fit the circumstances of
the
university, district, and candidates.
CD Installation Instructions
Please install and play on your computer as outlined below:
Installation:
Copy the folder(s) from the CD to your hard disk for the training you wish to view. Be certain that you have enough free space before copying (60MB/Training). Remove the CD from the computer.
Playing the Trainings:
Be sure that the sound on your computer is turned on and close all programs that are currently open.
Open the folder on your hard disk for the training that you wish to play.
PC: To open the training, double-click on the “BeginPC” file.
Macintosh: Double-click on the “BeginMac.hqx” file. This will install a new file called “begin.” Double-click on this “begin” file to open the training.
Use the controls at the bottom of the screen to navigate through the various slides of the training, stopping to discuss when necessary. If you do not hear the introduction music and voice right away, check to make sure your sound is on and then click to replay the slide.
When completed, simply close the window to exit the training.
Tips:
On a PC, you can hit Ctrl + F anytime to play the training at full screen. To exit, hit Ctrl + F again, then close the window.
On a Mac, you can hit Apple + F anytime to play the training at full screen. To exit, hit Apple + F again, then close the window.
PC System Requirements Ability to Play Audio Windows 98 or higher (XP recommended) 256 MB RAM 60 MB Free Hard Disk space per training Pentium 3 or higher processor recommended |
Macintosh System Requirements Ability to Play Audio Mac OS 9.x , OS X 10.1.x or Mac OS X 10.2.x 256 MB RAM 60 MB Free Hard Disk space per training G3 or higher processor recommended |
OUTLINE OF TRAINING SESSIONS
Session | Length
|
Time |
Activity |
Page | Slides
|
Set Up |
Half Day: Three Hours |
30 | Bull’s Eye | 5
| |
Session I:
Research Base Transforming Student Learning Transforming Teacher Practice |
30 | State Reform Closing the Achievement Gap Elements of Positive Impact | 7
|
1-13 | |
90
|
Theories of Intellectual Development Theories Worksheets Pgs. 17-27 |
11 |
14-17
| ||
10 | Changes in Practice: Metacognition |
15 |
18
| ||
10
| State Continuum Cert/Prof Dev |
15 |
19-21
| ||
Session II: Evidence Guidelines Evidence Samples Planning Evidence | Half Day: Three Hours |
15 | Elements of Quality Evidence |
28 |
22-25
|
15 |
Understanding Descriptions of Practice:
1d1, 1d2, 1d3 |
30 |
26 | ||
10
| 1d1: What is a learning target? |
31 |
27-28
| ||
1d2: Progression of learning |
31 |
29 | |||
1d3: Available resources |
32 |
30
| |||
15
| Forms of Evidence: Observation/Artifacts |
32
|
31-33 | ||
30 |
Evidence Guidelines Handout Pgs. 39-58 | 34
|
34-35 | ||
60
|
Evidence Planning Worksheet 1d1 in Student Voice Handout Pg. 61-62 |
34
|
36-41 |
Session III:
Presenting Evidence | Half Day: Three Hours |
10 | Review 1d1 – Expand your understanding |
63
|
42-47 |
20 | Attributes of a Good Presentation |
66 |
48 | ||
10
| Preparing your own presentation |
67 |
49
| ||
20
| Intro/Practice giving feedback |
68 |
50-52
| ||
90 |
Present/Feedback Session Coaches roles Page 73 | 69
|
53 | ||
20
| Debriefing |
74 |
54
| ||
10
| Evidence Worksheet: 1d1 AND 1d2 in Student Voice |
76
|
55-56 | ||
Session IV: Learning to give Feedback and stretch suggestions |
Half Day: Three Hours |
10 | Review 1d2 – Stretch suggestions |
87
|
57-63 |
30 | Group Practice of Presentation and Feedback 1d1 and 1d2 Stretch 1d1 and 1d2 |
89 |
64
| ||
90
| Sharing and Feedback session |
90 |
65
| ||
30
| Debriefing Teacher Learning Record Pg.59 |
91 |
66
| ||
30
| Evidence Worksheet: 1d1, 1d2, 1d3, Student Voice , and All Students | 93
|
67--70 | ||
Session V: Practicing giving quality Feedback and stretch suggestions | Half Day: Three Hours |
10 | Review of 1d3 – Stretch suggestions |
101
|
71-74 |
30
| Group Practice of Presentation and Feedback 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3 Stretch 1d3 |
103 | 75-79
| ||
60 | Presentation and Feedback Session Presentation/Feedback/Process Coach |
104 |
80 | ||
20
| Debriefing |
106 | 81
| ||
60 | Evidence Worksheet: 1d1, 1d2, 1d3, in Student Voice, , All Students, Multiple Contexts |
109 | 82-84
| ||
Session VI: Quality Evidence Final Feedback Session | Half Day: Three Hours |
30 | Outline the Attributes of Each Element of Quality Evidence: All Descriptions of Practice, Student Voice, All Students, Multiple Contexts, and Over time |
115 | 85
|
30 | Presentation and Feedback Session – Presentation/Feedback/Process/Timer |
118 | 86-88
| ||
30 | Debriefing/Evaluation | 119
|
89 | ||
90
| Reflecting on how many Descriptions of Practice are in your evidence. Plan to collect evidence on the remainder. |
Introduction
Learning how to gather, analyze and present quality evidence of positive impact on student learning is a central feature of the Professional Certification process. This CD program is intended to guide cohorts into forming professional learning communities where they:
Each session focuses on a new element of quality evidence building the candidates’ capacity to create a collection of powerful evidence, in student voice, demonstrating fulfillment of the Professional Certification requirements. The intention of engaging candidates in these professional discussions about their evidence is to ensure:
a) high quality of the evidence is being presented in fulfillment of the Professional Certification requirements; and
b) to ensure candidates going through Professional Certification are being equipped to be the kind of practitioner that will help us reach our state reform goals.
These practice sessions will engage the students in more student behaviors than just those mentioned in the three Descriptions of Practice we are focusing on. We do this in order that they can see in the end that one piece of evidence can be used to demonstrate multiple Descriptions of Practice. The goal is to prepare the candidates to have quality evidence for their culminating seminar.
Potential Set for the Process
SET UP
Objective: Give a setup to the candidates prior to the beginning of this process to personalize the process and connect the evidence collection to their own beliefs about quality student learning.
Approximate time: 30 Minutes
Facilitator Notes: In this activity we are beginning to establish the baseline of common agreements and understandings that are an essential component of learning how to help one another gather, present, and give feedback to one another on creating quality evidence for the culminating seminar. This exercise gets the cohort to focus on common understandings and beliefs about quality student learning experiences. We are setting this up in a true constructivist manner to first get the learners to want to engage and to see the meaningful nature of what we are asking them to do.
Facilitator instructions :
1. Ask each person to think about the most powerful POSITIVE learning experience they have ever had as a student where they can still remember what they learned. It can be any kind of positive learning experience. It is good to give an example of your own and explain what made it so valuable to you. Then ask them to think silently to themselves about what theirs might be. (Just give about 1 min. for them to think about it)
2. Then ask them to share those experiences with their group. (Give them about 10 min. to share – divide 10 min. by # in the group at each table)
3. After they have all shared, ask them to make a list of attributes that made those experiences so powerful. These should be attributes FROM THE STUDENT PERSPECTIVE – what made them so powerful to them as the learner – what was happening in that experience to make it so powerful. (Take about 10 min.)
4. In the whole group, have your bull’s-eye graphic on a large diagram. Have each group give a couple of the attributes from their list. When each group has shared, then ask if there are others they still have on their list that haven’t been shared. You write these attributes on the bull’ s-eye chart. You are creating a list of common attributes of those powerful learning experiences to which you can refer in the future. (This will take about 10 min.)
5. We would all wish that all learning could be this powerful and memorable to our students. If this was going to be possible, what would have to be going on within the school culture to make that happen? Have them discuss this as a group and make one list to share with the whole group. (Take about 10 min.)
6. Again, ask each group to only share one or two on their list with the whole group. When each group is finished, ask if there are other things on their lists that were not shared. Record the culture attributes on the chart.
7. Now go over all the student attributes and culture attributes as a review in your own words. Let them know we will be using this bull’s eye throughout the training, so post it and keep it visible. If the bull’s eye can be transcribed into a handout, that is highest and best.
Bull’s-Eye Target
Create this on a large poster board that can be pinned to the wall and used for several trainings. Participants are going to be writing on it. The outer circle should not be smaller than 24 inches in diameter and twice that would not be too large.
S ESSION I
Objective: Readiness - Understand how the Professional Certification Descriptions of Practice fit into our state reform efforts.
Approximate time: 3 Hours
Materials needed:
Facilitator Notes:
This isn’t just another professional development experience – the professional development within this series occurs as the result of the participant’s active involvement in the process. All of the professional development is obtained through self-discovery while participating in the process. The interactions are deliberately designed for the participants to experience the personalized learning opportunities we want for our students.
It is intended that this process will become continuous and sustained as a regular part of every professional teacher’s professional growth process. The specific protocols of the carefully orchestrated interactions develop the trust and behaviors required for productive collaborative and cooperative group interactions that are needed in the buildings to ensure that the personalized learning is occurring for every student.
Facilitator Instructions: We are going to begin with the research behind the work we will be doing this year and how it all fits into our state reform efforts.
Play slides 1-5.
Slide # |
Slide Script |
Narrative on Slide
|
1 |
Washington State Professional Development
In Action
|
Washington State has been engaged in significant reform since 1993. The
Professional Certification process is an integral part our reform efforts. The
intention of our reform is to engage all students in the kind of classroom
performance that will enable all students to consistently grow toward
achievement of our Essential Academic Learning Requirements.
This training is intended to assist our professional certification candidates to learn how to gather evidence that their instruction reflects the type of student performance called for in our state reform. |
2 |
State Reform:
1997 WAC
Teachers must demonstrate a positive impact on student learning
|
At the heart of state reform is the focus on improving student learning and
closing the achievement gap. In 1997 this WAC was passed that required
teachers going through the certification process to demonstrate a positive
impact on student learning. This law was important because it required us to
decide if we wanted to define and measure positive impact with a test as they
have done in Texas, Tennessee, and Kentucky or if we wanted to define and
measure positive impact using other types of classroom-based assessments.
As a state we engaged in a research project involving practitioners around the state to define classroom-based positive impact statements. This work resulted in defining what students will be doing if a teacher is having a positive impact on student learning. These positive impact statements are embedded within all levels of our teacher certification and professional development processes as well as in many other aspects of state work in fulfillment of the 1997 law. Beginning September 2002, those positive impact statements were used to create the Descriptions of Practice for Professional Certification. |
3 |
P
ROFESSIONAL
C
ERTIFICATION
R
EQUIREMENTS
Effective Teaching
Professional Development
Professional Contributions
| Your Professional Certification Handbook outlines the standards and process for Professional Certification. There are three main Standards for Professional Certification: Effective Teaching, Professional Development, and Professional Contributions. Each standard has criteria for meeting the standard. Each criterion has Descriptions of Practice that illustrate how a teacher must demonstrate positive impact on student learning to successfully complete the Professional Certification process. |
4
| Building your Understanding #1a: |
What does it look like when a student’s learning has been positively
impacted by engagement in the kind of learning used to describe our
Descriptions of Practice? Let’s watch the video clip. Video clip of Lydia |
5 | Building your Understanding #1a: Screen same as Narrative Script |
|
Building Your Understanding Activity #1a:
Facilitator Instructions:
1. Discuss: Imagine if this type of learning was happening throughout your building and All Students in your school cared about and were able to talk about their learning this way.
2. Discuss: If this was happening school-wide, how would it affect you as a teacher in your individual classroom? How would your job change, as a teacher, if students arrived in your classroom with these skills?
3. What impact would providing this type of learning school-wide have on your students’ learning?
Facilitator Notes: This is what we are trying to make happen within our school. Think about our bull’s eye.
Facilitator Notes: We have used the phrase personalized learning in lieu of constructivist learning. We have done this to avoid the misunderstandings around the term constructivist. We define what we mean by personalized in the following slides. Make sure that participants don’t confuse personalizing with individualizing. Individualizin g refers to organizing the content that needs to be covered in individual learning segments, and students progress through them in different ways and at different rates. Personalizing refers to the learning process – the process of learning is a personal experience and has meaning to each student. Make sure the participants are clear about this distinction.
Facilitator Instructions: Ask the participants to take out a pencil and paper. As they listen to the video of the teacher, write down the key elements and words that this teacher is describing.
Play slides 6-10.
Slide # |
Slide Script |
Narrative on Slide
|
6a
|
The very nature of this student’s learning has been changed.
What has changed for this teacher? | Now that we have seen what it looks like when a student is engaged in the type of learning needed for our state reform, what did the teacher do to help this student self-regulate her own learning process? |
6b | Let’s watch a video of one very accomplished teacher describing the changes she has made in the way she works with her students and how it has helped her have a better understanding of what the students have actually understood, and what that knowledge enables her to do that was not occurring before she applied the shift in her philosophy. Video clip of Cathy . | |
7 |
This teacher is talking about changing the very nature of the student’s
intellectual work. Teachers who used this training were able to make these changes. | This teacher is talking about looking at teaching and learning in a significantly different way. The demands being made on the student’s intellectual processing while practicing their traditional content of reading, writing, and math is what research is telling us needs reforming. This teacher is describing how she has changed the very nature of her student’s intellectual work. What are the specific changes? The process of learning has been demystified for her students. The students are given the opportunity to explain their learning targets and how they are going to meet them. The students have been taught the skills and practice articulating and discussing their learning. The students understand the relevance of the learning and take an active role in self-regulating their normal everyday learning tasks by reflecting on what they did well and what they need to do differently next time. |
8 |
“A Decade of Reform”
Personalized Student Learning:
1) All reform efforts must result in changes in the qualitative nature of
student learning experiences.
Consistent and Continuous:
2) Changes in individual classroom practices must be made within changes in
school-wide practices.
|
One of the most important research documents to be published within our state
is the 2003 Fouts report called “A Decade of Reform.” This document
provided an analysis of the various reform efforts within hundreds of districts
across Washington State. The report evaluated which efforts resulted in
changes in student learning that resulted in improved WASL scores. The report has two major conclusions: The first states that all reform efforts must result in changes in the qualitative nature of student learning experiences. The kinds of changes in the student learning experiences called for in the report are what our state refers to as personalized student learning opportunities. The second conclusion states that changes in individual classroom practices must be made within school-wide practices. It was demonstrated in the report that we have many good things happening in individual classrooms. What is missing is the continuity and consistency of learning for the students throughout their school experience. Teachers must work together collaboratively and cooperatively within a school to provide consistency of learning for All Students. The training sessions you are taking part in will teach you the skills for working in learning communities to collaboratively and cooperatively work with others in your building to provide the kind of continuity and consistency needed to positively impact student learning. |
9 |
Personalized Student Learning:
1) All reform efforts must result in changes in the qualitative nature of student learning experiences. The degree to which personalized teaching was observed at the school correlated significantly with student success on the “WASL.” |
The report defined the needed change in qualitative nature of the student
learning experiences in the same way that our state defined positive impact on
student learning. Positive Impact on student learning is created when student
learning becomes a personal learning process - the learning has been
personalized. In Professional Certification these learning processes are
called Descriptions of Practice. These descriptions illustrate in what way
students must be engaged in their own learning in order that their learning is
positively impacted.
The state WASL is a performance-based test that is very different than other tests used around the United States to measure student learning. It requires students to describe their answers and how they arrived at their conclusions. It requires students to think about what they are learning and see patterns within their learning that can be applied to many contexts and kinds of experiences. The Descriptions of Practice engage students in these kinds of learning processes with the intent that they will become the way students learn in their every day classroom experience. |
10 | The analysis in the Fouts report showed that students in high poverty schools, which in our state are the lower performing schools, received significantly less personalized instruction. |
The Fouts report analysis also showed that students in high poverty schools,
which in our state are the lower performing schools, received significantly
less of these kinds of learning experiences.
Duane Baker, of the BERC Group who conducted research for the Fouts report, combined the results of three extensive research projects from both Washington and Texas on schools of poverty.
His research concluded: In struggling classrooms where students showed marked improvement in their performance, the teacher engaging students in these impacting learning experiences was the only mitigating factor. |
Facilitator Notes: You may want to stop here for a minute and have them discuss how impactual they feel this research is in terms of identifying the kind of learning that causes student performance to improve.
11 |
Why would providing these Personalized Learning Processes make such a difference? Defining Personalized Learning Processes… …make the learning meaningful Know purpose and relevance Personalized Learning Processes… …require student articulation of understanding Describe and explain Personalized Learning Processes… …require student self-regulation Monitor, adjust, and assess |
Why would personalizing the learning experiences make such a difference?
Personalized Learning Processes make the learning meaningful. It must be clear
to the students what the purpose of the learning is and how it is relevant to
their lives.
Personalized Learning Processes require students to articulate their own understanding. This means that they must be taught the skills that enable them to describe and explain their understanding.
Personalized Learning Processes by definition require students to be actively engaged in the process of self-regulating their own learning. This means they must be given the skills to monitor, adjust, and assess their own learning.
|
12 |
Why does personalizing student learning mediate the socialization differences
in our classrooms?
Cultural socialization is not a problem for students when the schooling process is organized around personalized learning processes.
When asked, students will always articulate what they are learning from their own cultural perspective, in their own language, and in accordance with their own way of being.
When asked, students will always describe how they are working on solving a problem based upon their prior understanding and experience.
When given the opportunity to do so, students will think about problems and their learning in accordance with their own mental frameworks.
When given the opportunity, students will always approach their learning in accordance with who they are.
When given the opportunity, students will always view their success or need to improve based on their own understanding and perspective. |
Why does personalizing student learning mediate the multicultural differences
in our classrooms?
Cultural socialization is not a problem for students when the schooling process is organized around personalized learning processes.
When asked, students will always articulate what they are learning from their own cultural perspective, in their own language, and in accordance with their own way of being.
When asked, students will always describe how they are working on solving a problem based upon their prior understanding and experience.
When given the opportunity to do so, students will think about problems and their learning in accordance with their own mental frameworks.
When given the opportunity, students will always approach their learning in accordance with who they are.
When given the opportunity, students will always view their success or need to improve based on their own understanding and perspective. |
13 | High School students affected by the reform |
Students of all ages and across all content areas can learn these skills.
Listen to the video of this middle school student talking about her learning.
Video clip of Ilwaco Student |
Facilitator Instructions: Discuss with the participants what was happening for this student. In a usual classroom situation, the student will complete an assignment and get feedback from the teacher, usually in the form of red pen corrections and/or a grade. Who did the student get the feedback from in this example? The student informed herself based on a class rubric defining the components and progression of learning to reach the learning target. The student used the rubric to decide what needed correcting and wrote a reflection. What we don’t see is that the student then corrects her work and only then does she hand in her “best” work with the reflection and her first effort. How valuable is this information to the teacher? What would s/he do with that information?
14 |
Building Your Understanding #1b
|
To increase our understanding of personalizing student learning, we are going
to take time this session to look at various theories of intellectual
development and discuss the implications of each theory on the professional
decisions we make.
As we look at each theory, think about your own emerging theory of intellectual development and how that affects your instruction and classroom management decisions. All of us make our instructional and management decisions based on how we believe our students learn. Your learning target is to answer the question: What would need to be added to what you are currently doing to increase the personalizing of the student learning in your own classroom?
After we learn about each theory, we will practice moving the teacher and student behaviors used in each theory into the personalizing of student learning required for our evidence.
Let’s learn about those theories together. |
Building Your Understanding Activity #1b:
1. Set-up for jigsaw activity:
2. Group Tasks: (in large groups, set them up in pairs to do each of these)
3. Presentation: The person giving the history goes first followed by the key points of the same theory. One theory at a time, complete the history and key point for each theory ONLY. Then stop and have the discussion on the next slide.
Facilitator Instructions : Make sure you stop here before going on to a discussion of the teacher and student behaviors for each theory. Many times groups want to do the entire activity at once. The impact is higher when you divide these two parts of the activity. Our goal in the next activity is for the candidates to begin to consider which theories they use in their classroom and have ideas of how to transform student engagement into the personalized Descriptions of Practice.
Play slide 15.
Slide # |
Slide Script |
Narrative on slide
|
15 |
Building Your Understanding #1c
What are the student and teacher implications for each theory?
|
The important thing for us, as educators, to understand is that whatever theory
of intellectual development we ascribe to, that theory drives all of our
attitudes, strategies, instructional choices, and classroom management
decisions. Looking at each theory from a historical standpoint, it is easy to
find some humor within some of the theories. We can easily identify which of
the theories do not represent high level learning opportunities for the
students. However, the reality is we can find each of these theories occurring
in even some of our finest classrooms. In fact, there are times in the
learning process it may be considered good practice to begin the presentation
of learning using the empiricist or behaviorist theory. The point is to
recognize which theories actually represent low level intellectual development
for our students. What is required to increase the student engagement in order
that ALL students are experiencing high level intellectual development?
Let’s take a close look now at the implications of each theory for teacher and student behavior. Each group will now present the student and teacher implications for each theory. |
Building Your Understanding Activity #1c
Discuss: What are the classroom implications for each theory? The third and fourth columns of the chart list the classroom implications for the teacher and the student for each theory as they are discussed. (Each group has the implications on their sheets). Below is a chart with possible suggestions to help you, as the facilitator, guide the discussion.
The chart will also show you what needs to happen to personalize the teacher and student implications, BUT DO NOT DO THIS AT THIS TIME. Only do the teacher and student implications for all five theories. Then stop and play the next slide.
Theories of Intellectual Development Chart – NOT A HANDOUT
(discussion sample for facilitator only)
Theory |
Key Points |
What is the teacher doing?
|
What is the student doing?
|
Personalizing the Learning
|
Empiricist |
Participants will provide key points and graphic for each theory
|
|
Phrenology |
Participants will provide key points and graphic for each theory
|
|
|
|
Behaviorist
|
Participants will provide key points and graphic for each theory
|
|
|
|
Progressive |
Participants will provide key points and graphic for each theory
|
|
|
|
Constructivist
|
Participants will provide key points and graphic for each theory
|
|
|
|
Play slides 16-17.
16 |
What is the dynamic that needs to happen in the classroom to personalize the
learning?
Personalized Student Learning In Action
Effective Teaching Practices plus Personalize
TEACHER knows what needs to be taught
STUDENT can articulate the learning target and why it is relevant and
meaningful to him or her
TEACHER makes instructional decisions based on strategies that work for the
class
STUDENT knows the strategies to choose from and can describe his or her
learning process
TEACHER measures performance against set standard for All Students
STUDENT measures performance against his or her own progress
TEACHER reports degree of student success or failure to students and parents
STUDENT articulates what s/he did well, what s/he needs to do better, and what
s/he will do differently next time |
What is the dynamic that needs to happen in the classroom to personalize the
student learning? We are not saying that anyone needs to totally transform what
they do with their students. Many of these theories have an effective role to
play in the learning process. But it is important to know when it is
appropriate to apply various theories and when it is not. It is also important
to know what needs to happen if you are choosing theories that do not
effectively engage students in high levels of intellectual development to
transform the learning into personalized learning.
In order to transform our teaching and learning practices, we need to be sure we understand the intended shift that needs to be made. The focus shifts from what the teacher is doing to what students need to be doing if our instruction is going to have a positive impact on student learning. What we are not saying is that the traditional teacher skills are no longer needed. Quite the contrary. It will always be important for teachers to know their content material and how to teach it effectively to their students. What is added to the practice to personalize the learning is that students need to be able to articulate their learning target and why it is relevant and meaningful to him or her.
It will always be essential for teachers to make well-informed instructional decisions, choosing strategies that work the best for the class. What needs to be added to the practice to personalize the learning is that students need to know the learning strategies they can choose from and can describe his or her learning process.
It will always be essential for teachers to measure student performance against set standards for All Students. What needs to be added to the practice to personalize the learning is for students to know how to measure their own performance against his or her own progress.
It will always be essential for teachers to report the degree of student success or failure to students and parents. What needs to be added to the practice to personalize the learning is for students to know how and the opportunity to articulate what s/he did well, what s/he needs to do better, and what s/he will do differently next time.
It is important that we understand that personalized learning opportunities is what will engage students in high level intellectual activity and increase their achievement levels. |
17 |
Let’s personalize the student learning for each theory of intellectual
development.
How does this change the student’s opportunity for intellectual development? |
Let’s look at each theory and think about what would have to be added to
personalize the students’ learning. In each instance what we will be
doing is increasing the student’s engagement in their own learning
process. As we transform each theory, think about how that transformation
would change the students’ intellectual development.
|
Facilitator Note s: Have the participants brainstorm what would have to be added to each theory in order to personalize the learning if a teacher recognizes they are mainly engaging students in each of the theories. They will notice that there is less that needs to happen for constructivist theory, as it most closely represents the kind of learning we want for state reform. Fill in the column headed “ ;Personalize” on the wall chart. This column will assist teachers when we engage them in their own metacognition following this exercise.
Facilitator Instructions : Have each person do the metacognition by themselves. It is critical that they do this individually first, as this is the heart of metacognition – self reflection. When they have finished writing answers to both questions, have them turn to work in pairs and discuss their answers with a partner. Give them about 5 minutes to discuss. Then bring everyone back together as a group and discuss what came up in their paired discussions.
Leave slide18 on the screen for the participants to use.
Play slide 18.
18 |
Metacognition I
|
Before we go on, it is important for us to reflect on what we have learned so
far. Metacognitive reflection is a key component to any learning experience.
The purpose of doing a metacognitive reflection at the end of each section of
this training is to stimulate the learner’s internalizing of the key
concepts so it becomes the learner’s own – this is a step toward
engaging the learner as an active participant and taking ownership of his/her
own learning process. Reflect on these questions:
|
Facilitator Instructions : You should make sure all candidates have the state IN ACTION Professional Development continuum and direct your students to it before the next slide. After viewing the next slide, take time for them to look at the chart and discuss how through their Professional Certification process they are developing their capacity to increase their positive impact on student learning.
Play slide 19.
19 | Continuum | This is the state professional development continuum that illustrates how a teacher develops the capacity to impact student learning throughout his or her career. The process begins in pre-service, is supported during the first two years of service while participating in the Teacher Assistance Program, and is solidified while working on the Descriptions of Practice in Professional Certification. The chart also illustrates the connection between the state certification processes, career-long professional development, and the National Board certification. |
Facilitator Instructions: Direct the participants to look at the difference in the descriptions in each column and how the student engagement deepens as we move across the chart.
20 | Professional Certification rubrics of Descriptions of Practice | This training is focusing on the Professional Certification process and requirements. Your Professional Certification Handbook shows you the Descriptions of Practice that you will need to demonstrate are occurring in your classroom. It is important for you to read these student behaviors carefully, as the evidence you will turn in to complete the Professional Certification requirements will be demonstrating the students engaged in these specific behaviors. |
Outcome Session I:
Play slide 21.
21 |
Outcome Session I Personalized Student Learning: All reform efforts must result in changes in the qualitative nature of student learning experiences. Consistent and Continuous : Changes in individual classroom practices must be made within changes in school-wide practices. |
We have seen that providing the personalized learning processes is what will
help us transform student learning. Our Professional Certification process
helps us develop the skills and processes to provide these personalized
learning processes for all our students.
As we proceed with our training, we will begin by learning how to gather quality evidence of positive impact on student learning in fulfillment of our Professional Certification requirements. We will also learn how to work in learning communities to discuss and improve the evidence. This process will help develop your capacity to work collaboratively and cooperatively with others in your building to provide the consistency and continuity needed to improve student learning.
|
Discuss: Research to help us make our decisions.
Personalized Student Learning: All reform efforts must result in changes in the qualitative nature of student learning experiences.
Consistent and Continuous : Changes in individual classroom practices must be made within changes in school-wide practices.
Empiricists
Classical empiricists believed that people came into the world with a completely blank mind. They theorized that learning relied on passive experience or observation alone to obtain new learning; the learner was imprinted with information. The imprinting process was the acquisition of knowledge.
A primary disciple of the classical empiricist view was Aristotle (381-322 B.C.) who would say look around you if you seek the truth. Like Socrates, Aristotle looked to the reasoning used in observation as the source of knowledge. Aristotle totally relied on observation; he did not see a link between experimenting with what you observed and gaining knowledge. Using only observation, he developed the art of order and logic to demonstrate the validity of a line of thought. His writings on biology, based strictly on observation, gave birth to the classification and hierarchy of animals. He suggested that animals represented a living chain of logic and hierarchy. It wasn’t until 2,200 years later that Darwin picked up this idea and carried it forward to the theory of evolution. Using logic, Aristotle developed volumes of ideas about mathematics, philosophy, science, and life. His genius was referred to as the absolute authority for over a thousand years.
A more contemporary empiricist was a psychologist named Locke (1632-1704). Locke also believed that knowledge came through passive observation of the environment. Like Aristotle, he believed the mind had the ability to join ideas together in a logical fashion to make new ones. He viewed this as part of the biological programming we are born with. This view focuses on the child being born without anything in his or her mind except the ability to use logic. This logic required something to think about, and this we get through observation. As the child immediately begins to observe its environment through hearing, smelling, tasting, seeing, and touching, s/he processes the experiences logically and formulates simple ideas. These simple ideas are made more complex through more observation. The building of knowledge happens in a mechanical fashion. All ideas are limited to what has been passively experienced and logically deduced; the child does not deliberately do anything to obtain knowledge or to interact with what is being learned. To Locke, learning was something that happened to the child.
In this theory knowledge is stable and static because the essential properties of learning are knowable and relatively unchanging. The important assumption of empiricists is that the world is structured and that structure can be transmitted to the learner. Empiricists hold that the purpose of the mind is to "mirror" that reality and its structure through imprinting that reality on the mind.
Empiricists believe in the existence of a reliable body of knowledge about the world. As learners, the goal is to gain this knowledge; as educators, to transmit it. The empiricist further assumes that all learners will gain the exact same understanding and knowledge from what is presented. Learning is a process of assimilating the truths, knowledge, and skills that are established through logical observation and being exposed to reality and knowledge following logical domains of thought. There is the idea that there is a fixed world of knowledge that the student must come to know. Information is divided into parts and built into a whole concept.
Central idea: Learning is a one-way experience – from the environment to the learner – it is something that happens to the learner. The knowledge about the world is known and collected in defined sets of knowledge. The person imparting the knowledge does all the interpreting of these predetermined knowledge sets and events for the learner. Learners are told about the world and are expected to replicate its content and structure in their logical thinking. The teacher is the one doing the majority of the talking, and textbooks are the source of the fixed knowledge and skills that are transmitted. The teacher transfers the knowledge and skills to the passive learner. There is little room for student initiated ideas or questions. There is no independent thinking occurring or encouraged. There is little need for interaction between students, as the student is a passive recipient. All students receive the same information in the same way at the same time. Successful intellectual development is viewed as the learner accurately regurgitating the facts presented by the teacher.
Classroom Implications
Teacher: Textbooks and teachers are the sources for all learning. Teacher maintains an authoritarian relationship with the students. Teachers are the presenters of the required learning. They organize and guide the learning process. Teacher follows lessons in textbook with little alteration. Lecture is the main mode of delivery. Typically teachers don’t collaborate regarding the information presented. Teacher goal is student conformity and uniformity of learning. Wrong answers are rarely revisited for remediation.
Students: Students are passive receivers of the information. There is very little interaction between students. You would see students taking notes and asking a few questions. Students would typically be seated in rows. Students are observing the teacher and memorizing facts. Students have learned when they can give the correct predetermined answer. Student performance is judged by the teacher based on correct answers, generally on tests. Learning is rarely remembered beyond the “need to know” time frame.
Phrenology
Phrenology is the theory formulated on the belief that there is a correlation between external characteristics, such as skull and facial features, and a person's character, personality, and intelligence. By reading the bumps and shapes of the skull and other external features, it was thought you could determine intellectual potential, character, and specific personality traits.
The first attempt to locate mental and psychological faculties within the head can be traced back to the philosopher Aristotle (381-322 BC) of ancient Greece . However, that thought wasn’t substantially expanded until the end of the eighteenth century when the German physician, Franz Joseph Gall (1758- 1828 ), made an observation that he thought there was a correlation between certain mental capabilities and the shapes of his classmates’ heads. For instance, prominent eyes tended to be related to the classmate having a good memory, shape of the forehead denoted specific personality characteristics, and bumps on the head correlated to different talents.
Franz Gall is considered the founding father of phrenology. His theory of phrenology was based on these principles: moral and intellectual faculties are innate; the way moral and intellectual potential is manifested depends on brain organization; the brain has as many organs or parts as there are propensities, and these parts of the brain differ from one another in essential ways; and the shape and form of the skull or head directly reflects the internal development of those brain organs. Gall added to the hypothesis that different areas of the brain served different functions and those related to specific external characteristics. By carefully observing and evaluating someone’s head shape, you could determine his/her strengths and weaknesses and could, in fact, construct a mental profile of that person. Gall was the first to use scientific measurement to create maps of the skull and relate them to brain function. He outlined around thirty-seven powers and “organs” of the mind to be used for evaluating a person’s potentials.
The most important collaborator of Gall was Johann Spurzheim ( 1776- 1832 ), who successfully popularized and spread both the term phrenology and the theory in England and the United States . This idea had great popularity in England where the ruling class used the theory to justify the “inferiority” of its colonial subjects. Phrenology as a theory was very popular in the United States from 1820-1850. The theory was used as evidence of the intellectual superiority of some cultural groups over others.
Gall did make important contributions to brain science with his concept that brain function was localized. This part of his hypothesis was proven to be correct by Pierre-Paul Broca and others in France in the 1860s, but not as the theory of phrenology implied; localized brain functions have absolutely no correlation to external features in modern science as phrenology suggests. Modern science has demonstrated that there are different kinds of intellectual capacities, levels of talents, and skills that are correlated to brain development, but they are not related to any specific external characteristics.
At the heart of phrenology, as a theory of intellectual development, is the belief that external factors correlate to brain function, which translate into learning potential and personality characteristics. There are a range of beliefs about student learning that are closely related to phrenology. These are not so carefully defined, but highly implemented. It is well documented that intellectual ability is often equated with a whole range of other external physical characteristics of height, beauty, athletic talent, etc. Many believe they can predict the intellectual potential of learners by examining external factors such as their external economic, social, and cultural environment. We know that these factors can affect performance in our traditional schools, but the reasons they affect performance are in no way related to brain capacity or useful in terms of determining intellectual potential.
Central idea: Intellectual development and potential of students can be determined by observing external characteristics. The shape and size of human skulls, eyes, ears, and noses reflects differences in brain function. This theory is based on external characteristics as indicators of specific learning abilities and talents.
Classroom Implications
Teacher: Teachers equate external factors, such as appearance, economics, or membership within dominant social and/or cultural group, with ability. Teachers give preference to students who they deem have the most desirable or pleasing physical characteristics; more preference is given to the beautiful child over the less attractive; short people have less potential than tall; athletes are to be given favor and exception; upper class have more potential than lower class; dominant culture have more potential than minorities. Teachers direct the majority of their attention and time to the students with the most potential, in their view. Physically and mentally challenged children are often seen as having no real future, so little effort is given to helping them deal with their challenges to learn.
Students: Students with specifically identified appearance or membership in specific economic or cultural groups are identified as low achieving students. These students are aware there are lower expectations for their learning. Students know which students will be chosen to answer teacher questions and to lead group work. Students know which students are the “best” students and make no effort if they are not one of them. “Best” students know they are the best and are expected to achieve.
Behaviorist
In the 1870s the field of philosophy was divided into philosophy and psychology. The field of philosophy was regarded as an art, and psychology was regarded as a science. As a science, psychology required scientific proofs. As a result, the psychologists completely focused on scientific observation, hypothesis, experiment, validation, and verification through repetition.
Psychology’s focus now became prediction and the ability to control human behavior. In the search for how learning occurs, the focus changed from how knowledge was acquired to a new focus on causes of observable human behavior. It shifted from looking at the complexity of thought to the complexity of behaviors. This was a fundamental shift in thinking. This learning theory was called behaviorism.
Behaviorists believe that learning resides in a process called conditioning. Conditioning results as each new response is associated with a particular stimulus. Early behaviorists were strongly influenced by the publishing in 1859 of Darwin’s (a biologist) theory of evolution, the study of the continuously changing nature of living beings. The central premise was based on drives and instincts in animals and how they would respond to stimulus. The focus of the experiments was to gain the ability to predict and, therefore, condition and control the response. Behaviorists’ experiments and conclusions were based on scientific experiments that could be replicated with animals, not on empirical experiences with humans. They hypothesized that animal behavior could be correlated to human behavior.
Behaviorist theory came from the research of a Russian physiologist named Evan P. Pavlov. In the early 1900s Pavlov was studying how animals learned behaviors through reactions to the environment. He discovered that whenever he fed his dogs, they would produce saliva. Pavlov then rang a bell each time he fed the dogs. Over time, he found that he could just ring the bell and the dogs would make the association and begin to salivate. He called this phenomenon “conditioning and response.”
In 1898 E. L. Thorndike (1874-1949) published his idea that the more an activity or behavior is practiced, the better it will be learned. He based this on the belief that reinforced behaviors caused nerve pathways to be established in the brain. The more often the person reacted in the same way to a particular stimulus, the stronger the pathway. In addition, if the response to the stimulus had an emotionally pleasing effect, then the likelihood that the subject would repeat the response when confronted with the same stimulus was high. This aligned with and supported the behaviorists’ view and the ability to correlate animal learning to human learning.
Behaviorism as a learning theory for humans was introduced by psychologist John B. Watson (1878-1958) in 1913. Watson thought that Pavlov’s idea of conditioning was the underpinning of intellectual learning in humans. He demonstrated that responses can be conditioned in humans in the same way Pavlov conditioned animals. He thought that stimulus substitutions of one kind or another took place from birth until death. Watson believed that almost any response could be produced in a child if he could control the child’s environment.
In the late 1930s B. F. Skinner, a behavioral psychologist, studied how to control the environment by focusing on how conditioned behavior is related to the type of conditioning being given. He specifically studied the effects of rewards and punishments. Skinner discovered that he could predict and cause specific behavior in his laboratory animals by the way he used rewards. He found that rewards increased the probability that desired behaviors would be reproduced, and punishments discouraged replication of responses. He also discovered that behavior and response did not have to be rewarded each time to be effective. In fact, if rewarding was consistently the pattern, the behavior would not occur without the reward. What he felt was important was that the learner got messages from the environment about his/her actions or behaviors, and from that feedback, s/he learned patterns of behavior. Therefore, using rewards as reinforcement for correct or desired behavior could cause a predictable result. By not rewarding unwanted behavior, the undesirable response could be stopped. Learning, therefore, simply became the acquisition of new behaviors based upon relevant rewards or punishments.
Central idea: Learning, in the behaviorist view, is an interactive process where the teacher lays out the correct responses, and then the learner carefully learns those responses by getting rewards for correct behavior and punishment for wrong behavior. The learning process is completely conditioned responses by way of rewards and punishment (oftentimes grades). The learner simply responds to rewards or punishment and, therefore, memorizes the desired behaviors or answers. Behavior is totally directed by the teacher.
Classroom Implications
Teacher: The teacher is the keeper of the information and gives it out in a planned, sequential manner, rewarding correct responses. The teacher leads students through acquisition of appropriate behaviors and learning. Immediate praise or rewards are given to students giving correct responses. A wrong answer receives remedial practice until the correct answer is given. Teachers often use programmed learning methods where the student is allowed to move to the next lesson when the correct answer is given.
Students: Students depend on the teacher for their learning. Learning is limited by teacher’s knowledge and skills. All the students’ responses are controlled; and they are not encouraged to either use creative thinking, think of alternative strategies, or expand on the learning beyond what the teacher has decided must be learned. Student uses guesswork to figure out correct response. Student values the reward and fears the punishment. Only wants to learn if there is a reward for doing so. Learning is an isolated experience, and there is little opportunity for collaboration between students. Students are often competitive with each other.
Progressive Theory
The progressive movement was defined by an emphasis on the individual child, informality of classroom procedures, and encouragement of self-exploration and self-expression. The individual learner is actively involved in initiating what is to be learned. The progressive’s ideas were firmly grounded in the empiricist’s view of learning being based on observation and experience, but added to that notion the Gestalt discovery or “ah ha” experience as the underpinning of acquiring new learning.
Famous progressive educators in the 1800s were Horace Mann (1796-1859), Francis Parker, and G. Stanley Hall. In the 1900s a leader of the progressive movement was John Dewey (1859-1952). He stressed that the focus needed to be on the individual child, and as such the learning should be interesting and meaningful to the child.
Like all the behaviorists, Darwin’s theory of evolution had a major influence on Dewey’s thoughts. However, instead of thinking about the drives and instincts of animals and how they respond to stimulus (behaviorists), he focused on the evolving of thinking and learning in response to the species’ need for survival. In order to survive, humans have to have the ability to predict or forewarn themselves of possible dangers. Based on that, we must have the ability to hypothesize and plan. This emphasis on the practical necessity of predicting and problem solving became the underpinning of this theory of intellectual development. Learning was based on hypothesizing a problem, making plans to solve it, and the level of intelligence acquired was based on the effectiveness of those plans.
It was a deliberate interacting with and acting effectively upon the environment that caused learning. Dewey theorized that one successful planning and solving experience directed and helped the learner understand the next. This continual building on experiences produced logical impulses, thoughts, and ideas. Plans of action come internally from logical ideas. The purpose of ideas is to increase the ability to solve problems.
Dewey advocated that learning experiences should be active participation in the realities of the world. Those real-world activities would produce dilemmas. The learner would put forth effort to solve the dilemma by formulating ideas. Ideas are what promote the building of knowledge. Not all knowledge builds intelligence. Intelligence building is based on the degree to which ideas are effective.
Dewey’s view of education, therefore, focused on the student encountering real-life problems which the learner was interested in solving. He criticized schools as setting problems that were relevant to the teacher and what the teacher wanted to teach, but not necessarily, in fact rarely, of relevance or interest to the student.
Of critical importance was that the learner has interest in doing some kind of mental work. The actual individual struggle to find meaning and relevance for the new experience was the essence of the learning experience itself. Students needed to enlist their own problem solving, insights, and creative imaginings to engage high level thinking and build intelligence. The highest level of building intelligence occurred when a solution is tested in other contexts against other people’s ideas. Dewey also said that if the learner can understand the general layout of the new experience (as in a map), s/he will more readily learn the details which give depth to the intellect.
William Kirkpatrick, a student of Dewey, felt that teachers’ concern with structured room setups, authoritarian teacher/student relationships, and a student’s ability to memorize led to passive students and conformity. He stated that such classrooms did not promote learning but engaged students in rote behaviors that did not require intellectual activity (Kirkpatrick, 1929). In this environment, students rarely remembered their “learning” beyond the “need to know” for classroom tasks.
In the 1940s and 50s educators became very critical of the progressive movement, saying that students did not learn the fundamental school subjects well enough without standard progression of learning to master specific content. Progressive educators pointed to studies showing students’ long term learning occurred just as well in progressive classrooms as it did in traditional ones. However when the Russians launched Sputnik, indicating the United States was behind the Russians, educators put an end to the progressive movement in the late 1950s in favor of more structured learning.
Central idea: Learning starts with an idea or problem that is perceived by the learner. Then the learner struggles to get a clear formation of the problem by checking observations and characteristics, drawing on prior knowledge and weighing the similarities and differences to better understand the situation. Once the problem is clearly understood, the learner looks for possible solutions: examining and comparing the various parts of the problem, relevance to the situation, context, and cause and effects. Then the mind begins to come up with a plan of action by beginning with a hypothesis. The hypothesis is tested and, if the problem is solved, the learning has occurred.
Classroom Implications
Teacher: Teacher promotes student explorations of areas of interest to the students. Students are guided through discovery learning. Students are encouraged to formulate questions and guided into projects to find the answers to those questions. Instructional strategies focus on individualized instruction and projects. Teacher provides multiple resources and multiple settings for students to interact with to promote learning. Teacher is simultaneously developing the physical, social, emotional, and mental abilities. There is no formal curriculum or learning standards other than encouraging high level thinking.
Students: Every student is paying attention to and in the process of interacting with his/her environment. Students decide what they want to learn about. Students engage in projects of their own design and interest. Students interact with their environment and have direct hands-on experience from which they formulate their questions.
Constructivist Theory
The constructivists believe that intelligence is developed through active interaction between the learner and feedback from his/her environment. Central to the theory is that the learner builds his/her reasoning abilities in progressing levels of reasoning complexity. The defining idea is that it is the complexity of the reasoning that a subject is able to use that is the measure of intelligence, not just correct responses. Therefore, in learning, wrong answers are as valuable to the learner as right ones because they cause mental conflict which internally stimulates the learner to reason, and that reasoning constructs higher understanding and intelligence.
One of the strongest contributions to this theory was by a Swiss psychologist named Jean Piaget (1896-1980). His research and publications on the construction of intelligence range from 1919-1980. Jean Piaget spent much of his professional life listening to and watching children. He studied their reasoning processes and began noticing how they worked to find reasons for the things they were experiencing. His conclusion was that children do not think as adults think; they have their own unique logic and that logic develops in specific stages (sensorimotor, preoperational, concrete operational, formal operational – Pat Arlin added a fifth level called creative problem finding). Piaget was a scientist, not an educator, but his studies have affected the science of thinking about the way children learn as active constructors of their own knowledge, constantly testing and creating their own understanding about the world and the way it works.
Piaget never thought of himself as a child psychologist nor an educator. His real interest was epistemology — the theory of knowledge — which, like physics, was considered a branch of philosophy until Piaget came along and made it a science. As educators, we all have studied Piaget’s four stages of intellectual development; however, central to his theory was the way children construct knowledge, not just the progressing levels in which that occurs. He theorized that learning occurs as the result of the internal process of a self-regulating system where the subject intrinsically programs the brain to engage in purposeful behavior. Without the subject’s intent to do mental work, no meaningful learning will occur.
According to this view, all life forms are self-regulating in nature. The impulse to begin the cycle of knowledge building will begin with either an external sensory input or internal creative insight. The input of this new information is matched in two ways: 1) the desire to do mental work on the information; 2) to prior knowledge and understanding contained in the subject’s own intellectual mental structure. If the subject is intrinsically motivated to pay attention to the new information, the “ learning” activity begins. At this point the subject self-regulates the brain to continue gathering the information needed to find meaning and gain understanding about the new information.
All incoming information is compared to prior knowledge. If the information is the same as what has been previously understood, no mental work is required. If the information differs from what has been previously understood, it creates a mental conflict, or disequilibrium. At this point, the learner has to self-regulate whether to engage in mental motion to resolve the conflict or to stop paying attention to like input. If they program their brain to resolve the conflict, they will either adjust their prior knowledge to incorporate the new information or change their prior knowledge to build an entirely new mental structure for the new information. It is important to note that conflict with prior knowledge can occur without resulting in the desire to resolve it. In that case, the learner self-regulates that no mental work will occur resulting in no new learning.
Being presented with “disequilibrium” and having the internal motivation to find answers and resolve the mental conflict is a critical component of constructivist learning.
Vygotsky (1978) contributed to the constructivist theory the notion that what children do with the assistance of others is a high contributor to their mental development rather than just what they can do alone. What a learner first figures out with assistance of others, they are able to do independently tomorrow. This has focused attention on the role of assistance from peers and adults as a way to enhance intelligence by exposure to more complex thought, encountering more disequilibrium, and higher internal motivation from the desire to contribute to the group.
Central idea: Learning is self-regulating in nature. Meaningful learning does not occur unless the learner understands the relevance of the learning for themselves and wants to engage in the mental work to learn it. Developing within the learner the ability to think and reason is central and becoming skilled at deeper and more complex thought processes constitutes learning. It is the complexity of the reasoning that a person does that builds intelligence. Each learner constructs his/her knowledge developmentally in progressing levels of complexities. There is an intentional curriculum and the student engages in the progression of learning in accordance with his/her developmental ability to understand. The opportunity for the learner to explain their thinking within their own perceptual framework is foundational; being equipped to metacognate their learning process is the cornerstone of self-regulating learning.
Classroom Implications
Teacher: The teacher guides and facilitates the learners’ self-regulation of their own learning process. There are intentional learning targets and the teacher helps the students make intentional connections to relevance of the learning and prior knowledge and experience. The teacher helps students recognize their learning strengths and how to compensate for their weaknesses. The teacher provides many opportunities for self-regulation of learning through student self-assessment and reflection, both orally and in writing. Reflection focuses on the content that is being learned, but more importantly, on the learning process itself, what worked, what didn’t, why, and what will be done differently to be more successful in learning what needs to be learned next time.
Students: The learner is an active participant in the learning. The learner can articulate the intentional learning targets. Learners are able to describe the relevance and value of the learning for themselves – this provides the internal motivation to do mental work to gain their own understanding. The learner is able to describe his/her strategies and understanding. Learners are able to identify what new learning they are seeking and how they will obtain that learning. The learner actively self-regulates his/her learning through constant reflection, monitoring, and adjusting. Students take ownership and responsibility for themselves as learners.
Theories Discussion Chart
You need to create the headings and tape them to the wall so that there is room for the participants to put up their drawings. This is also a good handout for the participants to record their own notes.
Theory of Intellectual
Development |
Key points of the theory |
Classroom Implications
|
What the teacher is doing
|
What the student is doing
|
Personalize | ||
Empiricist
| ||||
Phrenology
| ||||
Behaviorist
| ||||
Progressive
| ||||
Constructivist
|
S ESSION II
Objective: Learn how to gather one piece of evidence using Student Voice to demonstrate that students can articulate the learning targets.
Approximate time: 3 Hours
Materials needed:
Facilitator Instructions:
Set up:
Play slides 22-26.
Slide # |
Slide Script |
Narrative on slide
|
22 |
Session II:
Beginning the Process Learning How to Gather and Present Evidence of Positive Impact on Student Learning as defined in the Professional Certification Personalizing Student Learning = Descriptions of Practice
|
The goal of these practice sessions is to help you learn how to gather and
present evidence of positive impact on student learning in fulfillment of your
Professional Certification requirements. You will be gathering evidence that
the student behaviors illustrated in the Descriptions of Practice are occurring
in your classroom.
As we begin this process, we want to remember and reflect on the research that
is guiding our professional decisions about student learning. The research
focused on two main points: 1) all reform efforts must change the qualitative
nature of the student learning experience – these personalized learning
opportunities are clearly defined for us in our Descriptions of Practice; 2)
changes in individual classroom practice must be made within school-wide
changes – we must learn how to work collaboratively and cooperatively in
order that we can work with other members of our staff to ensure all student
learning is personalized. By taking part in the learning communities we are
forming within our Professional Certification process, you are developing your
capacity to accomplish both of these important skills.
This process will ultimately enable you to set specific professional
development goals and provide quality evidence that will demonstrate that
students are now engaged in the specific learning behaviors that will improve
their learning and achievement.
How will you learn how to gather, analyze, and present quality evidence
demonstrating the degree to which the Descriptions of Practice are occurring in
your classroom?
|
23 |
What are we gathering evidence of?
You will be providing evidence of your capacity to engage your students in the
Descriptions of Practice
Credible and convincing proof that the students are engaged in the specific behaviors illustrated in the Descriptions of Practice |
Ultimately you will be providing evidence of your capacity to engage students
in all the Descriptions of Practice. To learn how to present quality evidence,
we are going to focus on just three of the Descriptions of Practice found in
Criterion 1d1. By the end of these practice sessions you will be able to
collect, analyze, and present evidence that is credible and convincing proof
that the students are engaged in the Descriptions of Practice required for
successful completion of your Professional Certification Requirements. We will
be proceeding with the training on the assumption that these student behaviors
are taking place to some degree within your classroom, and you are ready to
learn how to gather evidence.
Evidence needs to be credible and convincing proof that students are engaged in
these specific behaviors. The question is always: how do we know the
evidence is good evidence, enough evidence, truthful evidence? We need
quality evidence. |
Facilitator Instructions: Direct the participants to the Evidence Guideline handout that you have given them. The five elements discussed in the next slide are on that handout.
24 |
Your Evidence Guideline handout
Five Elements of Quality Evidence
CREDIBLE:
1) ALL the Student Behaviors of the specified Descriptions of Practice are
included in the evidence
2) STUDENT VOICE – students describe in their own words their mastery of
the specific Descriptions of Practice
CONVINCING:
3) ALL STUDENTS – there needs to be proof that everyone in the class has
the skills described in the Descriptions of Practice
4) MULTIPLE CONTEXTS – the specific Descriptions of Practice are applied
in multiple ways
5) OVER TIME – the specific Descriptions of Practice are practiced over
and over throughout the year in the normal routine of classroom learning
|
There are five critical elements of credible and convincing evidence that the
students have mastered the student skills and behaviors called for in the
Descriptions of Practice. We will be learning and mastering how to collect
credible and convincing evidence by methodically learning about each of the
five elements of quality evidence throughout the year. During each of our
meeting times together, we will be focusing on one of the elements.
Let’s look at them now.
First, All the student behaviors of the specified Descriptions of Practice are
demonstrated in the evidence: Our evidence is not complete unless all the
student behaviors listed in the intended Descriptions of Practice are
demonstrated. Each of the described student behaviors is part of demonstrating
your positive impact on student learning.
Student Voice: The most credible and convincing way to show whether or not the
students have learned and mastered the Descriptions of Practice is for them to
tell us in their own words what they have learned and how they are applying
it.
All Students: It isn’t enough for one bright student to be able to
accomplish the Descriptions of Practice. We need to know that all
the students are engaged in the student behaviors outlined in the Descriptions
of Practice.
Multiple Contexts: We are looking for mastery, not that the students applied
the specific skills and behaviors in just one learning experience. We want to
see that they can apply the skills during many different learning tasks. These
may be in different content areas or different types of tasks within the same
content area.
Over Time: We want to know that the students are practicing the specific
Descriptions of Practice over and over throughout the year, not that the
students did it once. We want to see that the students are able to apply the
skills and behaviors as a regular part of their learning experience.
Of the five elements, the first two are the foundation of the evidence and make
it credible. The other three give depth and make the evidence convincing. It
is the combining of all five that make it quality evidence.
|
25
|
Building Your Understanding Activity #2a
|
Even though in our training we will be working on one element of quality
evidence at a time and building our understanding of how to incorporate all
five, to help you remember how each element fits into all five elements, draw a
graphic that illustrates the five elements of quality evidence. Be as
creative as you want to be – just create an illustration that will help
you remember all five elements. |
Building Your Understanding Activity #2a:
Facilitator Instructions : It is a great touch to have blank paper and colored markers for them to use for this activity. The purpose of this activity is to get the participants to process the information we have just given them. They can create whatever kind of graphic they want to. Don’t give them any other instruction except that they are to create a graphic illustrating the five elements of quality evidence. It is important that they remember that there are five elements of quality evidence. Each session you can have them refer back to this drawing and acknowledge the next element we are adding to their work.
From a personalized standpoint, this is getting the participants to create a mental picture of their new learning. After they have completed the drawings, it is good to get them to hold them up and ask everyone to look around at how different each person pictured the information. The students each conceptualize and frame new information just as differently. This is why it is important that we continually refer back to the students’ understanding and get them to articulate how they are seeing it – they are always going to be framing what we tell them differently than we frame it. We need to find out how they picture in their minds the information we gave them and build on THEIR understanding.
26 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #2b
What are we gathering evidence of?
(Chart of the Descriptions of the three Descriptions of Practice)
|
The Descriptions of Practice for Professional Certification are defined student
behaviors that cause personalized student engagement in their learning.
Throughout your Professional Certification process you will need to provide
evidence of the degree to which the Descriptions of Practice are occurring in
your classroom. This training is about learning how to gather and present
quality evidence in fulfillment of your Professional Certification
requirements. To learn what quality is, we will focus on Criterion 1(d)
designing and/or adapting challenging curriculum that is based on the diverse
needs of each student. In order to teach you how to gather evidence for this
criterion, we will focus on three Descriptions of Practice: 1d1 Students can
articulate the required learning targets; 1d2 Students know what is needed to
move to the next level of performance; and 1d3 Students are aware of and
utilize resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as
appropriate.
We will teach you how to gather evidence that the students are engaged in these
behaviors. Then we will teach you how to engage in professional discussions,
within a learning community format, with your cohort about the quality of this
evidence. In your last sharing session you will identify how many of the
Descriptions of Practice the evidence you bring in represents and plan the
remaining evidence you will need for your Culminating Seminar.
|
You are gathering evidence of these
DESCRIPTIONS OF PRACTICE for Criterion 1d |
Evidence focus
|
Personalizing student behaviors
your evidence will demonstrate: |
1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets | Students describe
(1) their learning targets (2) why the learning is important to them (3) how they will demonstrate they have reached them |
1d2 Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance | Students
(1)articulate the progression of steps to reach the learning targets (2) identify, on their own, where they are in that progression (3) describe what they need to do to move to the next level of performance |
1d3 Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation,
acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate | Students are
(1) aware of the options to get support and access appropriate help, when needed (2) in their daily work, consistently utilizing the resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as is appropriate |
Play slide 27.
27 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #2c
A learning target is the outcome for the specific lesson you are engaging the
students in.
This fades out and then:
Guiding questions to help you identify the learning target:
|
In order to fully understand these descriptions of practice, let’s look at
them one at a time and discuss the specifics of what the student behaviors
are.
Description of Practice 1d1: Students can articulate the required learning targets
What is a learning target? A learning target is the outcome for the specific lesson you are engaging the students in. It is not the EALR or GLE, but a series of learning targets will accomplish a specific GLE which is the larger learning goal. A learning target is what you want the students to have learned as a result of participating in this lesson or learning activity.
Guiding questions to help you identify the learning target: a) As the result of this lesson, what do you want the students to know and be able to do? b) Why is it important that they achieve this new learning – what will they be able to do as a result of having acquired this learning? c) Therefore, the most important thing for them to carry away from engaging in this particular learning experience is____________________________________.
THIS IS THE LEARNING TARGET
|
28 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #2d
|
We have our GLEs which are the big picture learning goals we have for our students. A learning target is one of pieces of learning the students need to have on their way to learning the larger GLE. We may over a period of time be gaining the skills and knowledge we need to complete our understanding and mastery of the GLE. The learning target refers to the part of those skills and knowledge we are working on today. The learning target may be the culminating lesson where we are asking students to demonstrate they can apply several past daily targets in today’s work. That application is a culminating learning target. |
29 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #2e
Description of Practice 1d-2
|
Description of Practice 1d2: Students know what is needed to move to the next
level of performance
We want the students to be able to tell us which of today’s skills they understand and can apply and which ones they almost have but aren’t too sure about; and which ones don’t they get at all. This is a key feature to personalizing student learning. We want the students to be able to describe and explain their learning so that we know from them what they have understood and can do. Often time students can actually be successful on an assignment by carefully following the directions from the teacher without really understanding what it is they are doing. By engaging students in a process to describe what they understand and are able to do, we know the reality of what they have gained from today’s learning experience. |
30 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #2f
Description of Practice 1d-3
1d3.
Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation,
acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate
|
Description of Practice 1d3: Students are aware of and utilize resources for
assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate
|
Facilitator Notes : Stop and have a discussion about the difference between a large GLE learning goal and the target for the lesson or activity the students are currently engaged in. The learning target discussion creates, for the student, the understanding of what they are supposed to get out of what you are doing with them today. This is critical to the learning process.
Play slide 31.
31 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #2g
What kind of evidence can we gather to demonstrate the five elements?
You use any combination of these two forms of evidence:
|
There are two forms of evidence that we will use this year to help with the
gathering of evidence to verify that the teacher has the capacity to provide
the specific Descriptions of Practice required for the evidence. Observation
and artifacts are direct verification that the student behaviors we are looking
for are in action in your classroom.
|
Building Your Understanding #2g:
Facilitator Instructions : Refer to the Evidence Guidelines handout that you have given to them. The boxes at the bottom of the first page begin to show the forms of evidence and how they are illustrated in the “at standard” statements.
Play slide 32.
32 |
The following video clips demonstrate the forms of observation and artifacts as
evidence. (
Note any combination of these may be used as appropriate evidence.)
Watch for:
|
The following video clips demonstrate the forms of observation and artifacts as
evidence. (
Note any combination of these may be used as appropriate evidence.)
Watch for:
How the students are articulating their learning target.
Look for
students articulating their understanding.
Look for the
students describing how they self-regulate their learning process.
|
Facilitator Instructions : In the clip with the teacher talking to the principal, did they notice that the teacher was saying that “we created” and “we decided” – those papers could be used as artifacts because the students created the papers and then used them. The observation of the little girl is showing her using the artifacts. Ask the participants in what way they saw the clips illustrating that the students knew their learning targets, how to describe and explain their understanding, and in what ways they saw that the students were self-regulating their own learning process. This is what personalized learning looks like.
Play slide 33.
33 |
Gathering Evidence
Think back on the video clips.
What attributes of these examples made the gathering of evidence reasonable and doable, not overwhelming?
| It is important to notice how easily this evidence can be gathered. It is not intended that a teacher spend a great deal of time and effort compiling the evidence. This is not intended to create yet something else for the teacher to do. Evidence is gathered during the normal flow of the classroom day. It is simple, short, and clear. If the specific student behaviors for the Descriptions of Practice are occurring in the classroom, evidence should not be difficult to gather. |
Play slide 34.
34 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #2h
Your handout will give you some possible evidences you can use to demonstrate
each Descriptions of Practice we are focusing on while learning how to gather
quality evidence.
|
Your handout will give you some possible evidences you can use to demonstrate
that the specific student behaviors described in each Descriptions of Practice
we are focusing on while learning how to gather quality evidence.
|
Building Your Understanding Activity #2h:
Facilitator Instructions : Refer the participants to the Evidence Guidelines handout again. Look at the boxes at the bottom of the first page again. Have them spend some time looking at the suggestions of how the “at standard” statements can be demonstrated in either observation or artifacts. Discuss how the Observation and Artifacts are the keys when verifying student mastery of the Descriptions of Practice. Students themselves are talking about their learning. Students are self-regulating their learning processes. They are engaged in personalized learning processes.
Play slide 35.
35 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #2i Each member of the team will take one of the handouts of sample evidences.
Explain to your group what is going on in this piece of evidence.
What is it demonstrating? |
The Evidence Guidelines has a collection of sample evidences. Each sample is
demonstrating a different type of artifact that you could use alone or in
combination with others to demonstrate the students are engaged in the specific
Descriptions of Practice we are focusing our evidence on.
Take a few minutes to look at these samples so you have an idea of what you could do for your evidence. Your initial evidence will be much simpler than these end-of-the- year samples, but are these good examples of what an end-of-the-year piece of evidence could look like.
You will begin the process by only focusing your evidence on: Students can articulate the required learning targets , and bringing in evidence that the students are articulating the learning targets in Student Voice. As a result the evidence you will bring into our next practice session will be much, much simpler and shorter. These are intended to be examples to stretch your understanding of quality evidence and the student behaviors that evidence needs to be demonstrating. |
Building Your Understanding #2i:
Facilitator Instructions : Direct the participants to the samples of evidence in the Evidence Guidelines handout. Have each member of the team look at a different example and how it might be used as either a complete piece of evidence or to supplement other evidence. They will each present the evidence they looked at to the others on the team and tell them what was happening in the evidence. They are to note the variety of evidences and the variety of ways the Descriptions of Practice are being demonstrated in the evidence. Stress to them that their first attempts to gather evidence will be much simpler than these examples.
Play slides 36-37.
Slide # |
Slide Script |
Narrative on slide
|
36 |
Beginning the Process
Gathering Evidence of Positive Impact on Student Learning Take out the graphic of teacher and principal Everyone participating in the gathering of evidence is the only way to have an effective learning community. If everyone doesn’t bring in evidence, there isn’t anything for the group to talk about.
|
Now we are going to proceed with the first step in gathering and analyzing
evidence that the students have mastered the specific Descriptions of Practice
we are practicing gathering evidence of. In the learning process it is
critical that everyone in our cohort learning community learns how to do this
process and participates fully as a member of the team in gathering evidence.
Everyone participating in the gathering of evidence is the only way to have an
effective learning community. If everyone doesn’t bring in evidence,
there isn’t anything for the group to talk about. |
37 | 1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets |
To begin the learning process, each group member will be gathering evidence of
Description of Practice 1d1 - Students can articulate the required learning
targets. Ultimately during our practice sessions everyone will show evidence
that three of the Descriptions of Practice are occurring, but we will begin
with just one. |
Before continuing on, make sure that the participants have the Evidence Planning Worksheet. The next slides will be explaining how to use this sheet.
Play slide 38.
38 |
Evidence Planning Worksheet will come up on the screen showing each section as
it is discussed in the narrative. |
Each of you will be gathering evidence of the Description of Practice we refer
to as 1d1. How will you go about planning how to gather this evidence?
Let’s begin by looking at the Evidence Planning Sheet. At the top of each
Evidence Planning Sheet is the assignment for the session. In this instance
your assignment is to gather Description of Practice 1d1 in Student Voice.
What is good evidence of Student Voice? On each Evidence Planning Sheet is a
section that gives examples and non-examples of the element we are focusing on.
In order to gather evidence of Student Voice, you must bring in examples
where the students are in some way explaining their learning. This may be
verbally, in writing, or someone observing and documenting what the students
have said. Their words must be personal, showing the learning target has
personal meaning to them. It will sound like the student’s own words.
What they are saying will, therefore, be age appropriate language. The
students will be making connections to their own understanding and experiences.
Student Voice is not the teacher telling what the students did, nor is it the
teacher telling them what to say. Do not script the students so that they are
just parroting back the teacher’s words. Be careful to ask open questions
that elicit their own thoughts. You cannot get Student Voice when you ask the
students questions that only give the answer you have set them up to say. If
your questions are too closed, they illustrate that the students are being
guided in their answers by the teacher. That is not Student Voice – it is
teacher voice being said by the student.
First describe what Descriptions of Practice are demonstrated in your evidence.
During your presentation, feel free to tell us how good you feel the evidence
is or isn’t and why – this is part of your analysis. The purpose of
the presentation is for you to analyze for your teammates where you are in your
ability to gather the evidence and for them to understand the evidence you
have brought in. In that way, they can gear their comments and tailor their
suggestions to what you might not already know. These discussions are intended
to help you learn – so ask for the help you feel you need so you get the
suggestions you want and need.
The second section of the Evidence Worksheet asks you to describe the context
of the lesson you are using for evidence collection. What is the long term
learning goal? What is the learning target? Remember, the learning target is
what you want the students to know and be able to do as a result of
participating in today’s learning experience. The learning target may be
a culminating learning target where students apply several previous targets.
The third section lists a series of questions that will both guide you in your
evidence collection and help you analyze the evidence you are bringing in for
your teammates. You may choose any content or lesson that you want.
The fourth section asks you to think about how your evidence is using the
elements of quality evidence. Remember your Evidence Guidelines examples.
OK – now you are ready to plan for the next session. Discuss a lesson
that you will be doing in the near future with your teammates and help each
other plan the evidence you could bring in next time. Before you leave this
session, it is our intent that you tried to fill out the Evidence Worksheet so
you are clear on what your evidence will look like. We suggest you work with
the students multiple times between this session and next. The evidence you
bring in may be different than the lesson you plan today. The purpose of
working with your team today is to be sure you understand the process of
planning your evidence. It is perfectly fine to change your decision if you
want to. The important thing is that you know how to use the planning sheet to
get the exact kind of evidence we are looking for. |
Facilitator Notes: The student behaviors described in the Descriptions of Practice are what the evidence should be demonstrating.
1. Remind teachers that eventually they will be responsible to bring in evidence demonstrating all the Descriptions of Practice, but as we are just beginning to learn the process, this session we will focus on Description of Practice 1d1.
2. It is not expected that the Description of Practice is occurring with your students to the fullest extent at this time. But it is important to begin thinking about how to make that happen. Your team members will be able to help you.
Play slide 39.
39 |
Building your Understanding Activity #2j
|
Now is the time for you to fill out this Evidence Planning Sheet. Work with a
partner to discuss what you could do to gather evidence of your Description of
Practice in Student Voice for the lesson you have chosen. Before you leave
this session, it is our intent that you have the Evidence Planning Sheet
completed so you know exactly what and how you will be gathering evidence to
bring to the next session. It is perfectly fine to change your decision if you
want to. The important thing is that you know how to use the planning sheet
to get the exact kind of evidence we are looking for.
. |
Building Your Understanding #2j:
Facilitator Instructions : You should direct everyone to first fill in their Evidence Planning Sheet alone by thinking about an upcoming lesson and projecting what they might do. When they have filled it out, they should discuss with their team members what they are planning to do with the students and what the evidence would look like. The purpose is for other members of the team to assist them with the actual lesson so that it deeply engages the students in the Descriptions of Practice. What new behaviors will they need to teach? How will they go about doing that? They will have about thirty minutes to do this. When they leave the class, they should have a pretty good idea of what they can bring in for evidence for the next session.
Play slides 40-41.
40 |
Your Assignment is:
|
Your assignment for the next session is to bring in evidence of Description of
Practice 1d1 in STUDENT VOICE.
This is the first time you will be bringing in evidence – we do not expect
for this to be grand evidence at this time. Your ability to bring in really
good evidence will build over time. All we want is for you to try. Bring in
something so that your group has evidence to discuss. We actually learn more
from non-examples than from an incredible piece of evidence at this time. The
discussions help us understand what we need to do to gather good evidence. So
just show up and bring in some attempt to gather the evidence – that will
be perfect. |
41 | Outcome Session II
Next session you will bring in evidence of
Description of Practice 1d1
in Student Voice to share with your team. |
This session we have examined what the elements of quality evidence.
We have learned what it means to gather evidence of Descriptions of Practice 1d
1, 2, and 3.
You have learned how to gather evidence in Student Voice.
You have completed the Evidence Planning Worksheet.
You will come next session with your evidence of only Description of Practice
1d1 in Student Voice to share with your team. Each time we meet, we will focus
on a different element and gradually you will begin to show evidence of all the
Descriptions of Practice that you will need to complete your Professional
Certification process successfully.
Learning collaboratively gives us the support we need – it also makes it a
more enjoyable and meaningful experience. |
Outcome Session II:
Facilitator Instructions :
Make sure that everyone has completed the Evidence Planning Worksheet and feels confident about what their assignment is. If anyone is unsure about what they are to bring in next time, direct them to discuss this with their team members first; if they still are unclear, you will talk to them individually to make sure they feel prepared before leaving.
Remind them that this will be their first attempt and no one expects the evidence to be strong evidence. We know that most all teachers are overachievers and are fearful about being asked to bring in something to share with others that isn’t just exactly right. Reassure them that this is a learning process and anything that they bring in will be exactly right. Having evidence to discuss will help us learn together how to get our evidence to be really good evidence. All we want them to do is bring in something and show up for the next session – there are no higher expectations.
Evidence Guidelines:
Five Elements of Quality Evidence
CREDIBLE:
CONVINCING:
You are gathering evidence of these
DESCRIPTIONS OF PRACTICE for Criterion 1d |
Evidence focus
|
Personalizing student behaviors
your evidence will demonstrate: |
1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets | Students describe
(1) their learning targets (2) why the learning is important to them (3) how they will demonstrate they have reached them |
1d2 Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance | Students
(1)articulate the progression of steps to reach the learning targets (2) identify, on their own, where they are in that progression (3) describe what they need to do to move to the next level of performance |
1d3 Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation,
acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate | Students are
(1) aware of the options to get support and access appropriate help, when needed (2) in their daily work, consistently utilizing the resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment as is appropriate |
Understanding Description of Practice 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3
1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets
Guiding questions to help you identify the learning target:
a) As the result of this lesson, what do you want the students to know and be able to do?
b) Why is it important that they achieve this new learning – what will they be able to do as a result of having acquired this learning?
c) Therefore, the most important thing for them to carry away from engaging in this learning experience is …
…the answer to this question IS THE LEARNING TARGET
Culminating Learning Target
Examples/Suggestions – There are others, these are just suggestions. Create your own.
Description of Practice 1d2: Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance
Description of Practice 1d2: Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance
One way to show students the progression of skills is Student/Teacher created rubrics
L
EARNING GOAL:
I
NTRO
PARAGRAPH
|
Depth
1 |
Depth
2 |
At Standard
Depth
3 |
Depth
4 |
Introductory sentence | Have a first sentence. | First sentence refers to the topic I am writing about. | First sentence is catchy and reader wants to continue reading. | First sentence is dynamic and extra clever. Reader wants to find out more. |
Supporting sentence | Have a second sentence. | Sentence that refers to the idea in the intro sentence. | First reason or idea that elaborates idea in intro sentence. | Sentence that gives convincing reason to support intro sentence. |
Another supporting sentence | Have a third sentence. | A second sentence that refers to the idea in the intro sentence. | Second reason or idea that elaborates idea in introductory sentence. | More than two additional dynamic and convincing ideas to support intro sentence. |
Concluding sentence | Have a last sentence. | Ending sentence that refers to the intro sentence. | Ending sentence that summarizes the supporting sentences. | Clever ending sentence that summarizes supporting ideas. |
Remember rubrics are only one way to show progressions. We are not advocating that every lesson or learning has to have a rubric. We are advocating that students can clearly see and identify what the progression of skills and knowledge are that they need to master in order to accomplish the daily learning target. This progression may also be related to a larger learning goal (as in the rubric above) and the students see how what they are doing today fits into that larger progression.
Any kind of organizational diagram or graphic that will allow students to articulate where they are in the progression to reach the learning is what we are looking for.
Depth of Content Learning
1= Simple recall of knowledge and skills
2= Understanding concepts, compare/contrast, see patterns or generalizations
3= Use to solve problem or use effectively in another context
4= Analyze for implications, inference
5= Combine ideas and create problems
6= Create own ideas/alternative solutions, see various perspectives/conclusions, broad application into multiple contexts
Learning Strategy Development using content
1= Followed directions
2= Used own strategy
3= Used own strategy and combined with strategy gained from another student
4= Combined multiple strategies
5= Analyzed various strategies and created complex strategy to fit a specific situation
Investigation
1= Find required information
2= Interpret and expand understanding of information: compare/contrast with other info
3= See value, make inferences, predictions, possible applications, connection to own life and learning
4= Analyze and verify validity of information; identify possible problems and/or possible implications
5= Draw conclusions, imply applications, see/test various alternatives to own conclusions
1d 3. Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate
Descriptions of Practice |
Forms of Evidence
|
Direct Observation
Audio or video tape of students
Principal, mentor, or peer observation
Supervisor observation |
Artifacts
Student journal entries
Student work with student reflections
Student surveys
Letters home to parents
| |
1d1. Students can articulate the required learning targets |
|
|
1d2. Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance |
|
|
1d3. Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate |
|
|
NOTE:
Evidence is intended to be short, clear, credible, and convincing. All of the Descriptions of Practice are inter-related, and the evidence should reflect this. Evidence should be gathered in the normal flow of the classroom day.
See the following sample evidences :
SAMPLE # 1 – ALL PRINCIPALS SHOULD USE THIS FORM OF EVIDENCE
or Teacher Evidence of Principal or Peer Observation
Teacher: XXXXXXXXX
Grade: Fourth
Observer: XXXXXXXXXX, Principal
Date XXXX Length of observation: 30 minutes
Description of Practice 1d
1. Students can articulate the required learning targets
2. Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance
3. Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate
Method of observation:
XXXXX and XXXXX randomly selected four students to interview. The teacher had prepared the students for the visit and they brought their journals, record of personal progress, and each had a couple of assignments.
We decided in the pre-conference on a series of questions that specifically related to the Descriptions of Practice that I would ask the students:
1. How do you know what the learning targets are for your assignments?
2. How do you decide what you need to do to reach them?
3. How will you know what level of performance you have reached?
4. What do you do if you need help and how do you access that help?
5. If you finished early because the learning was easy for you, are there resources available to you to expand your learning and how do you access them?
6. How do you assess your finished product?
7. How do you select the work your teacher will assess?
We randomly asked students in the group the questions. It became evident that the group was composed of a range of ability levels. All the students were able to discuss their learning and were able to add comments to each other’ ;s answers. One student answered each set of questions, but all the students showed their own work to demonstrate they all engaged in the processes being discussed. It was obvious that the students were used to talking about their work, and they were proud of their ability to do so. They said that sharing their work with one another was something they did every day. They each met with their teacher alone once every two weeks to review their personal progress - the teacher met with two to three students each day during work period. Every week the students wrote a letter home to their parents about what they had been learning and what they needed help with.
Evidence that supported that the teacher had reached standard in each of the focus areas (this could be audio taped, video taped, or written up):
Student One: Received questions 1 and 2. She was very excited to show us the rubric that the class had created for their writing assignment. “We were learning how to do good introductory and concluding paragraphs with three supporting paragraphs. These are hard for me because I want to put everything into the introductory paragraph. I used to just repeat everything I wrote in the first paragraph in my last paragraph. Now I know to list the topics in the first paragraph. Then I write all the important facts about each topic in separate paragraphs. Now my concluding paragraph says what is important about each topic. Then I check for spelling and punctuation.” We asked how she learned to write better introductory paragraphs. She brought out a brainstorming sheet for introductory paragraphs, supporting paragraphs, and concluding paragraphs. She explained that as a class they had made these ideas to help each other. Each time they practiced writing, they would use these sheets to get ideas. “I learned that to do a good job on my writing, I first have to decide what is important to do – then I can do it.”
Student Two: Received questions 3 and 4. He showed us a rubric and explained that they had created this rubric with the teacher and so everyone knows what is good work and what is not. “These squares are levels on the rubric and lets everyone know what our grade will be. We can decide what grade we want to get because we can read what we have to do and then decide either to do it or not. I always try to do everything listed on the rubric. If there is something I don’t know how to do, I see if that is something other kids are having trouble with, and I can join the small work group and learn how to do it better.” How do you assess your finished product? “It is hard for me to read my own work and see anything wrong with it. I wouldn’t write it that way if I knew it was wrong. So I ask someone to read my paper and tell me what they think. I usually ask Beth because she is really nice and tries to help me do better.” He produced a draft paper that Beth had made notes on for him. “When I make the corrections Beth tells me to make, then I get a good grade.” How do you learn from the marks Beth makes? “Beth tells me why she changed it. My teacher gets this one and my finished one. She talks to me about it, too. I’m a much better writer than I used to be.”
Student Three: Received questions 6 and 7. “I put all my work into a folder. At the end of the two weeks I can decide which one I think is best. Then I explain to my teacher why I think this is a good example of my best work. I used the rubric and then showed my teacher where in my work the different things on the rubrics were. I like being able to tell her why I think it is good before she looks at it so she knows what I was thinking when I wrote it. I feel like when I explain, then she will like it better.” If she likes what you wrote, will that be the reason for a good grade? “My teacher uses the rubric we created as a class to talk to me about my writing – she uses it to talk to everyone in the class. I won’t get a good grade if I haven’t done what is on the rubric.” The other students were quick to add their own stories about meeting with the teacher – it was obvious they all looked forward to those discussions and understood that is how they learn to perform better.
Student Four: Received question 5. “Every morning the teacher writes on the board what is going to happen that day. Each day we talk about what we can do if we finish early. Sometimes we show our work to a friend and ask for ideas to make it better. Sometimes we can use the activity file to get ideas of things we can do on our own to show we really understand.” Other students added that they can get library passes if they finish early. This student added, “My favorite thing to do if I finish early is to go to the back of the room to the computer where there is list of things we can do on the internet to get more ideas about what they are studying. If we do this, then we share with the rest of the class what we found.”
PRINCIPAL OR PEER RESOURCE #1 - Evidence Collection Worksheet
C OMPONENT #1 S TUDENTS ENGAGE IN CHALLENGING CURRICULUM
1a: Students know the learning targets and what is required to meet them |
Questions: |
What was your learning target for today? |
Why is this learning important to you? |
How will you demonstrate you have learned the target? |
Student 1
| |||
Student 2
| |||
Student 3
| |||
Student 4
|
1b: Students know the progression of learning to reach the targets |
Questions: |
What are the things you need to learn to reach the target?
|
Which of those things are you doing well? |
What will you do to move to the next level of performance?
|
Student 1
|
| ||
Student 2
|
|
|
Questions for 1b cont: |
What are the things you need to learn to reach the target?
|
Which of those things are you doing well? |
What will you do to move to the next level of performance?
|
Student 3
| |||
Student 4
|
1c: Students know how to access additional resources for support when needed |
Questions: |
What resources do you have to help you reach these targets?
|
If you needed help, what resources did you use and what help did they give you?
|
If you wanted to expand your learning, what resources did you use?
|
Student 1
| |||
Student 2
| |||
Student 3
| |||
Student 4
|
Comments:
Teacher Sample Evidence #1: Student Letter to parents
Description of Practice 1d:
1. Students can articulate the required learning targets
2. Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance
3. Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate
Dear Mom and Dad,
I am writing this letter to tell you about my progress with our long-term assignment called the City Studies Project. Please read over my progress and then be prepared to write me a letter back with your feedback.
My class began the City Studies Project back in January. We decided that we could use this project to meet several of our Social Studies and Language Arts standards. We looked at our standards for 6th grade and the GLEs, and I picked the ones that matched the project. We need to assess where we are on these before the end of the year. You will see how I did in my portfolio at the Student-Led conference next week. We posted our learning targets so that we could target the grade level expectation and district standards in our goals. For example, we did research on a major city (our research standard) and then developed a persuasive speech (communication GLE) explaining why it was the best city for an organization to move to. We presented our speech to the class. We made a brochure about our city and made maps and other visuals for our speech. Even though this was not a group project, my table group looked at each other’s progress and gave suggestions. We did this Project progress check about once every two weeks. As you can see, this was a very big project.
I accomplished a lot! I think the goal setting really helped me be successful. I used the strategy to do a timeline for the assignment. I broke it down into small tasks. I had to think about a good way to do this. I had to decide what needed to be done first, second, third, etc. I had to look at all that time and figure it out. I now know about the characteristics of cities and how to present data in a way that would show off the best points of the city. I learned about London and what it was like to live in this city. I researched in the library and on the internet. I wrote to the British Consulate for information also. I especially enjoyed making the visuals including the power point presentation and data visuals. I improved my technology skills because I had to apply what we learned in the lab. I think I did a really good job on the presentation. As you know I practiced quite a bit and was just a little nervous until I got into it. I really feel confident about being able to organize myself for a long-term project. I am very capable in using power point. I am capable of making a persuasive speech. I think I can write a pretty good persuasive essay now. I know that this is a standard for seventh grade and doing the speech will help me do this task next year. I am still working on some of my goals because I have not accomplished them. I think I can do a better job at analyzing data. I had a good display of data but didn’t really dig into what it meant. I think I can improve on my empathy. I am so independent and competitive that I sometimes don’t take the time to think about how my comments might be affecting my classmates who have more trouble with the reading assignments.
I would like you to write me back a brief letter with your feedback, suggestions and comments.
Sincerely, Jennifer
Teacher Sample Evidence #2: Audio Script
This is a high school English class. Three students are explaining their learning process.
Description of Practice 1d:
1. Students can articulate the required learning targets
2. Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance
3. Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate
Script of audio evidence:
What we were trying to do today was improve our writing of persuasive essays that we began last week. My essay is to persuade the school to let us have a sock hop on Valentine’s Day. My parents met at a sock hop in high school, and it sounds like a really fun way to have a dance. As a class, we talked about what makes an essay persuasive. Then we talked in groups about the parts of an essay that make it good writing. We made a class rubric of those two things so we all know what it is supposed to look like when we are finished. I really like doing this because it makes it really clear. It is also a fun way to just learn the skill because we say what it looks like when it isn’t good and then when it is. A persuasive essay is supposed to make the reader like your idea. I might really give mine to the student body president when I am finished. Thinking I really want to do this makes me want to do a better job. If I write a bad essay, I have no chance.
So here is the rubric we made. Here is my finished essay. I thought my essay was a four on persuasiveness because to get a four it has to be convincing, have emotion, and have strong reasons that will make others like the idea, too. Here is my introductory paragraph. It has a strong beginning sentence that tells the reader that a sock hop would be a really different kind of dance, and we would play music from the 60s (which we all like) and we wear socks on our feet. I have three supporting paragraphs. My first paragraph talks about that in the sixties you didn’t have to be a pair to dance. It was OK if girls danced with girls, and sometimes boys danced with boys. So kids could come without dates which would be really great because unless you are dating someone, you stay at home usually. My second paragraph talked about wearing socks and the benefits of doing that. My third paragraph talked about that we would play music from the sixties which we all really like. My concluding paragraph talked about how it would be good for our school to have this kind of dance and how much fun it would be to do it.
We all handed our papers in without our names and just numbers that our teacher gave us. The papers were mixed up and handed back out so you had someone else’s paper. We used the rubric to give them suggestions of how to make their paper better. Then the papers went back to the teacher and we went up and got our own. They said that my paper was two in persuasiveness because my descriptions of the dance weren’t really exciting enough and they couldn’t picture how it would be to go to such a dance. They suggested I talked about the decorations and what else kids would wear besides socks that made it fun.
Before we made changes, the teacher gave each of us a 3X5 card and said for us to write which of the things on the rubric we thought we were really good at. Then we wrote on a piece of paper what we didn’t do as well as we wanted to and what didn’t go well at all and we had to do differently. We put the 3X5 card on the rubric on the wall. Everyone thought they were good at different stuff, which was cool. During our different free times or during study period, we could ask someone to help us make our paper better. I didn’t want to at first because I liked just doing it myself, but when I did I chose Bill. He is really fun so I thought he might think of things to make the dance sound like more fun. He gave me great ideas and we had fun doing it, too.
I rewrote my paper and corrected all the stuff. Now I was pretty sure I deserved a four on persuasiveness. Again we handed them all in without our names and we graded each other’s papers. I don’t know who graded my paper but they gave me all fours and said it was a cool paper and an awesome idea and hoped I really sent it to the principal and student body president. I am really excited to do it and see what happens.
Note: The teacher presented the rubric they made as a class and four papers that were edited, rewritten and then graded by the students.
Teacher Sample Evidence #3: Reflective Questions - The students created questions with the teacher and then each student wrote their own response. Then those responses were discussed in small groups. Each small group reported conclusions to the whole group.
Description of Practice 1d:
1. Students can articulate the required learning targets
2. Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance
3. Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate
Next time I do an invention, I will make a practice one out of cheap materials so I can decide what I need to change. Once I made my invention I had spent too much money on the materials and it was too hard to make changes without ruining the carrier and how it looked. I did a drawing but I couldn’t tell until I built it how it really looked. I might try to draw it using the computer but I will have to learn how to do that. I like being an inventor and I am going to try to think of something else to do and make it this summer.
Teacher Sample Evidence #4: Journal Entry
The teacher is showing three journal entries and has the rest of the class journals with her for the group to look at. These journals are for the entire year for each student.
Description of Practice 1d:
1. Students can articulate the required learning targets
2. Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance
3. Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate
Journal Entries:
Sarah Example of Good Student
Math – September 20 Today we are learning multiplication tables in math. I am to learn my two’s and three’s. I have three ways to practice. The first way is to study the flash cards just so I can practice and check to see if I did it right. The second way is to go to the electro board where the question is on one side and answers are mixed up on the other. If I choose the right answer the light will go on. The third way is to teach me to do it fast. I have a wheel with a 2 or 3 in the middle. On the outside of the wheel are numbers 1-9 all mixed up. I work with my partner to see how fast I can give the answer. Each time I try to do it faster. When I can do the whole wheel in 30 seconds then I can go to the next number to learn. I’m really good at going fast.
Writing - September 21 I am also learning to write paragraphs with introductory sentences, concluding sentences, and three to six supporting sentences. This means I have to tell what I am writing about first, then say three things about it, then say I told them about what I am writing about. I am good at everything but the concluding paragraph. I will meet with my teacher at 10:15 and she will work with me and several other kids who don’ t get it either. We are going to make rubrics to help us know when we have done a good job. I think the rubrics will be kind of like the ones my teacher made that we used last week. I like those rubrics because I know what I need to do to do a good job.
Joey Example of Fair Student
Math - January 25 I am learning to multiply two digit numbers. Yesterday I got confused and didn’t do them right because I started with the number on the left first. Today the teacher put up a picture on the wall that has a circle around the number to start with. I didn’t know why we had to start with that number. Sean didn’t know either and he asked the teacher how come. Sean and I will practice with beads in a box today. We can put same number of beads in each box as on the paper. When we are finished the teacher will check with us to see if we did it right. I hope I do it right.
Writing – January 26 We are writing a short story about anything we want. I am writing about going up in the mountains to snowboard with my Dad. I’m supposed to follow the rubrics. First I need an introductory paragraph for my story. Then I need three paragraphs telling three neat things about going up snowboarding. I end my story with why those things were fun. It will be a really good story because I liked my weekend. Tomorrow I will check each thing on the rubric to make sure I didn’t forget anything. I will try to use words that make it sound fun because it was really awesome.
Caitlin Example of Struggling Student
Math – May 4 Today I am going to work with Sam. Sam is in sixth grade. Sam came another day. He is good in math. We will practice the multiplication wheel. Remembering the numbers is hard for me. I am learning 6s. 5s were easy. 4s were hard. 6s are hard. I practice lots of different ways. Last night Grandma and me played a card game to practice 6. I got most right but was very slow. Sam will help me go faster. I like to multiply but it is easier to use the calculator that my Dad gave me. My teacher lets me use the calculator when I do assignments cause she knows it is hard. I can do everything with the calculator.
Writing – May 5 Sam will help me write my story. I get to tell him the story and he writes it all down for me. The teacher gave him the questions to ask me. I really like telling stories and Sam laughs and says I am funny. I like it when Sam laughs. When my story is all righted down my teacher asks me to read the rubric and check to see if I need to change anything. She will change it for me sometimes – or sometimes I take it home to change. My teacher is helping me learn to type my stories because the computer changes my mistakes. My stories look like Sarah’s when I do them on the computer. I can write good on the computer.
Group’s comments: We went over the journals with XXXXXXX and we decided that showing samples of a high, average, and low student at different points of time during the year would be the best demonstration. We also looked at all the journals to see that all the students wrote in the journals on a regular basis. We were surprised that they could explain their learning so well. At the beginning of the year only the very high students explained their learning clearly but by the end of the year everyone could articulate what was required, how they would get there, and what they needed to do for more help. This sample demonstrates the type of help XXXXXXX provided to the low students who were less able to perform. These samples are very representative of the quality of the journal entries for the class.
Teacher Sample Evidence #5: Exit Passes and Reflection POST-ITs - The students fill the exit passes out at the end of each class session and hand them to the teacher as they leave. The Reflection POST-Its are put on all assignments before they are handed in.
Description of Practice 1d:
1. Students can articulate the required learning targets
2. Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance
3. Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate
Resource #1:
Strategies to Embed the Description of Practice |
1d1:
1d2:
|
1d3:
|
Resource #2: Sample Writing Rubric for 1d2
Student checks off the skills demonstrated in their writing paper.
Name: _______________
Period: _______________
Date: _______________
Evidence of Learning (Math): “Students know how to access additional support when needed”
1) Daily Work:
What are some ways to get assistance on the work we are doing today? (list as many as you can)
For each resource, tell what specific help each would provide for you.
2) Assessment:
Give specific examples stating what you were able to do after accessing the resource that you couldn’t do before.
About how often do you utilize these options for assistance?
3) Enrichment/Extension/Supplement:
What are some of the enrichment/extension/supplement materials that are available to you? (list as many as you can)
About how often do you utilize these options?
Teacher’s Learning Record
Continually remark as the statements indicate where you are growing in your progression of learning.
Criteria
|
1
No use/limited use
|
2Beginning to use
|
3
Moving toward good solid use
|
4
Exemplary use |
1 D1 . STUDENTS CAN ARTICULATE THE REQUIRED LEARNING TARGETS |
Frequency & Usefulness |
|
|
|
|
Language & Variety
|
|
|
|
|
Importance of Target |
|
|
|
|
Demonstration of Target |
|
|
|
|
1 D2 . STUDENTS KNOW WHAT IS NEEDED TO MOVE TO THE NEXT LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE |
Progression of Learning
(Not the directions to complete the assignment- this is about the learning) |
|
|
|
|
Self Assessment Opportunities |
|
|
|
|
1 D3 . STUDENTS ARE AWARE OF AND UTILIZE RESOURCES |
Varied resources related to target |
|
|
|
|
Student use of resources |
|
|
|
|
Choose one item you circled. What will you do to move to the next step?
What resources are available/what resources will you use?
Materials Resources Human Resources
______________________________________________________________________________
Choose one item you circled. What will you do to move to the next step?
What resources are available/what resources will you use?
Materials Resources Human Resources
______________________________________________________________________________
Choose one item you circled. What will you do to move to the next step?
What resources are available/what resources will you use?
Materials Resources Human Resources
______________________________________________________________________________
Choose one item you circled. What will you do to move to the next step?
What resources are available/what resources will you use?
Materials Resources Human Resources
EVIDENCE WORKSHEET - for SESSION III
You will be gathering evidence of Description of Practice 1d1 in Student Voice.
This month the evidence focuses on Student Voice.
Attributes of Student Voice Not Student Voice
- Personalized - Student parroting teacher’s words
- Students’ own words - Teacher telling what students said or did
- Age appropriate language - Student responses guided by teacher’s closed
- Students make connection to own experiences questions
You are gathering evidence of these
DESCRIPTIONS OF PRACTICE for Criterion 1d |
Evidence focus
|
Personalizing student behaviors
your evidence will demonstrate: |
1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets | Students describe
(1) their learning targets (2) why the learning is important to them (3) how they will demonstrate they have reached them |
Culminating Learning Target
III. A NALYZE FOR US THE SPECIFICS OF YOUR D ESCRIPTIONS OF P RACTICE :
For this lesson, the learning targets I want students to know are: (Indicate type of target: Content, Strategies, Thinking Development, Procedural, Investigative/Inquiry or Reflective)…
These learning targets are important and relevant to the students because…
The students will demonstrate how they will know they have reached the targets by…
IV. A NALYZE FOR US HOW THIS EVIDENCE IS IN S TUDENT V OICE….
D ESCRIBE THE FORM(S) OF EVIDENCE YOU WILL USE |
Some examples of Student Voice:
|
Describe your evidence:
|
Suggestions for 1d1:
Learning Target: Improve your evidence and help improve others’ evidence.
You need to demonstrate : how to give a good presentation; ability to analyze the evidence; use the protocols to give feedback; and plan to gather evidence of 1d1 and 1d2 in Student Voice.
Approximate time: 3 Hours
Materials needed:
Facilitator Instructions: Put a white or yellow handout of the sample evidence that will be used in the video and the sample presentation all filled out, and one purple Evidence Worksheet at each place at the table. In the middle of the table place a pile of green Evidence Feedback Worksheets. To make sure you have enough, for each team multiply the number of participants times one less the number on each team, or use five if you don’t know. That will be the number of worksheets needed for the session (example: 25 participants and five people on each team 25 X 4 = 100 worksheets).
Play slide 42-43.
Slide # |
Slide Script |
Narrative on slide
|
42 |
Session III: Learning and Practicing How to Gather Quality Evidence
Learning Target: 1) Practicing presenting evidence
2) Practicing giving feedback to make the evidence more credible and convincing
Then the slide changes to: Developing the ability to analyze your own evidence
Give analytical feedback to others on the presented evidence |
Our assignment for this session was to bring in evidence of ONE Description of
Practice in Student Voice. You will be sharing the evidence you brought in
with your teammates. Hopefully everyone in the group brought in evidence, so
there are lots of evidences to discuss. The professional development these
sessions offer only occurs when you are an active participant. As you work to
gather the evidence, you discover your needed learning. As you work to make
the evidence stronger, your professional development occurs. Therefore, it is
important that everyone gather and present evidence. If everyone did not bring
in evidence, your group will need to discuss how to make sure everyone brings
in evidence next time. These sessions require evidence to talk about and the
participation of all the team members.
Our learning target for this session is to learn how to do good presentations and give feedback to one another to make the evidence more credible and convincing.
First, each team member needs to develop the ability to analyze their own evidence. Second, we learn to give analytical feedback to others on the presented evidence.
When giving feedback to others, we all are practicing and honing our skills of gathering and analyzing quality evidence. Through this process we are developing our staff into a cooperative and supportive learning community. We use the five elements of quality evidence for this analysis. |
43 |
Continuum chart
See below | This session we will be practicing how to analyze, present, and give feedback on the evidence each participant has brought with them. You have arrived today with your first attempt to gather evidence. We know that no one is sure whether or not their evidence is very strong evidence. Every group has those feelings at this time. As we continue the process each month, you will quickly develop your skills and feel very comfortable with the process. We will be practicing presenting evidence and giving feedback over and over. Today will be your first presenting and feedback session. You can see by the chart as you practice presenting and analyzing evidence, your skills and confidence will increase. Next session your confidence will be much stronger than it is today. By the end of all the practice sessions, it will be an easy process for you to participate in. In addition, you will have developed trust within your team and be very familiar with having professional conversations about student work. |
Continuum Chart
Beginning – III
|
Practicing - IV |
Practicing- V |
Mastery - VI |
|
|
|
|
Facilitator Instructions : Stop and discuss the chart on the screen. We are practicing this process for the first time. As we look at the continuum of learning, we can see that we should be feeling a bit unsure of this process at this point. This is because the process is new, and we are looking at student work in a new way. Everyone feels unsure at this point. You will become more confident as more of this process becomes integrated into your understanding. If we think of this as an adventure and realize that the benefits will occur quickly without huge efforts or time expended, it can be exciting. Look at where we will be next time - next time we already will have traveled a long way in the learning process.
Play slides 44-47.
44 | Reviewing 1d1: Students can articulate the learning targets | Let’s refer back to your Evidence Guidelines to the section talking about 1d1. As we do this review, think about the evidence you have brought in today. Make notes to yourself about the parts of your evidence you feel that you have done well and what parts aren’t as strong as you would like them to be. |
45 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #2c
A learning target is the outcome for the specific lesson you are engaging the
students in.
This fades out and then:
Guiding questions to help you identify the learning target:
a) As the result of this lesson, what do you want the students to know and be
able to do?
b) Why is it important that they achieve this new learning – what will
they be able to do as a result of having acquired this learning?
c) Therefore, the most important thing for them to carry away from engaging in
this particular learning experience is_____________.
THIS IS THE LEARNING TARGET
|
Description of Practice 1d1: Students can articulate the learning targets
,
focuses on learning targets. It is important to understand what we are meaning
by the term learning target.
What is a learning target? A learning target is the outcome for the specific lesson you are engaging the students in. It is not the EALR or GLE, but a series of learning targets will accomplish a specific GLE which is the larger learning goal. A learning target is what you want the students to have learned as a result of participating in this lesson or learning activity.
Guiding questions to help you identify the learning target: a) As the result of this lesson, what do you want the students to know and be able to do? b) Why is it important that they achieve this new learning – what will they be able to do as a result of having acquired this learning? c) Therefore, the most important thing for them to carry away from engaging in this particular learning experience is____________________________________.
THIS IS THE LEARNING TARGET
|
46 |
Suggestion of Kinds of Targets:
ContentLearning Strategies
Thinking Development
Procedural
Investigative/Inquiry Reflective
| There are many different kinds of learning targets: Content, Strategies, Thinking Development, Procedural, Investigative/Inquiry or Reflective just to name a few. These are suggestions and you can determine others on your own. If you are having difficulty making the learning target important and relevant to the students, perhaps it is because you are focused on the instructional objective rather than what the students will actually be able to carry away from this learning experience. |
Facilitator Notes: It is important to stop here and make sure people understand the difference between the learning target and the instructional objective. The instructional objective relates to the content you are covering in the lesson. What is really important and relevant about engaging in the practice of this content may be more than the procedure it is teaching. For instance: when you are practicing how to solve various kinds of equations, what is really important is that the student learns how to engage in the mathematical reasoning involved – the target is to understand and be able to use the mathematical reasoning, rather than just learn how to solve the equation.
47 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #2d
|
1d1. Students can articulate the learning targets
We have our GLEs which are the big picture learning goals we have for our students. A learning target is one of the pieces of learning the students need to have on their way to learning the larger GLE. We may over a period of time be gaining the skills and knowledge we need to complete our understanding and mastery of the GLE. The learning target refers to the part of those skills and knowledge we are working on today. The learning target may be the culminating lesson where we are asking students to demonstrate they can apply several past daily targets in today’s work. That application is a culminating learning target. |
Facilitator Instructions : Tell them to take out the Evidence Worksheet . What we will do now is see a video of a very good presentation of evidence. As a whole group we will discuss after watching the video what made this a good presentation of the evidence.
48 |
Practicing Presentation of Evidence Step One: Describe the way the Description of Practice is demonstrated in the evidence Step Two: Describe the way the evidence is in Student Voice |
Before we begin our own presentation and feedback sessions, let’s listen
to an expert presentation of an analysis of evidence. After the video, we will
brainstorm the qualities of a good presentation. After we learn how to do a
good presentation, you will fill out your own Evidence Worksheet. When you
give your presentation, you will simply read from this form to keep your
analysis short, concise, yet provide all the pertinent information your team
members will need to understand the evidence you are presenting. Each member
of the team should have an Evidence Worksheet to look at as we go through this
learning process.
Listen to the teacher present his evidence. The first part of the presentation
is an analysis of the evidence. The teacher does not show the evidence but
tells the audience what they will see. This analysis informs the team of what
he or she intends the evidence to demonstrate before they review the actual
evidence. Be listening to see if you are clear about the way Description of
Practice 1d1 is shown in the evidence. You should hear the teacher describe
the way the students are articulating the learning targets, why they are
important, as well as what it looks like when the students have reached the
targets. The teacher will also describe how he perceives this evidence is in
Student Voice.
Video clip of presentation – Rick |
Facilitator: Here is the script of Rick’s analysis:
RICK: The evidence I am presenting to you today is in the form of an audio tape and learning journals. You will be seeing whole class journals and listening to three students describe their learning. I had my TA transcribe what the students said to make it easier to evaluate. This is my third period high school chemistry class. The students are all juniors and seniors. These three students represent high, medium, and low performing students. This lesson is a lab experiment. We have done lab experiments before, but we focused mainly on proper use and respecting the lab equipment, safety, and clean up. This lesson is focusing on accuracy of experiments.
As a result of this lesson, the learning targets I want students to know are…
how to successfully conduct experiments and to understand that different liquids have different Ph levels. These Ph levels determine if the liquid is an acid or a base. They need to know that an acid has a Ph of less than 7 and a base has a Ph greater than 7.
This learning is important and relevant because…
Learning about scientific experiments and what we can learn from them is an important life concept. When we hear people give us facts about different things, we need to be able to determine if those facts were tested or if they are just opinion. The quality of the experiment others do affects the quality of the information of the results. Students need to be aware of this. It is also important that students know how to do their scientific experiments in order to confirm or test what they believe to be true or to find out new information. This learning is relevant for students because as a culture we are becoming more and more dependent on the use of scientific research and experiments to understand our world. We need to become thoughtful and knowledgeable consumers of information.
What I did to make sure the students knew the requirements to meet the lesson learning target was… We talked about the desired outcomes of our experiments and why it was important to do quality work during the experiment to get the necessary results. We talked about what it means to conduct a good experiment and how the quality of that experiment affects the results. If we do sloppy work, we get sloppy and inaccurate results. We discussed how this is applied to all experiments, and today we would practice the experiments by testing the Ph levels of various liquids. In the back of the room are notebooks for each experiment we will conduct. When they have completed the experiments, they should check their results for accuracy. If they didn’t get the correct results, they need to figure out what didn’t go right and redo the experiment.
The students demonstrated they knew the lesson learning targets and what was required to meet them by…Writing in their journals what the learning target was, how they conducted their experiment, and how they knew that they conducted accurate and reliable experiments. All students keep a learning log or journal of what they did well, what they didn’t, and what they need to do differently next time. All the assignments are kept in their learning journals and will be representing the work of the whole course.
This is evidence of Student Voice because… it is presented by the students themselves in their own words and actual voice. It is also Student Voice because the students have written in their own journals.
Facilitator Instructions : Stop, ask them to discuss as a whole group what the attributes were that made this a good presentation. That list should include: precise and concise information, short but clear context for the learning, clear statement of learning target, and why it was important to the students. Write the comments on the board in front of the room so they can look at the statements while planning their own presentation.
Facilitator Instructions : Now ask them to take a blank Evidence Worksheet from the middle of the table. Now everyone will listen to the CD to learn how to fill out the form for their own presentation on the evidence they brought in today.
Play slide 49.
49 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #3a:
Evidence Worksheet
|
Now it is time for you to complete the Evidence Worksheet for the evidence you
brought in today. In each of the following sessions, you will come to the
session with this form filled out and be ready to present your evidence. So
let’s learn how to do that now.
First describe in what way you feel the Description of Practice 1d1 is
demonstrated in the evidence you brought in. Feel free to tell us how good you
feel the evidence is or isn’t and why – this is part of your
analysis. The purpose of the presentation is for you to analyze for your
teammates where you are in your ability to gather the evidence and to
understand the evidence you have brought in. In that way, they can gear their
comments and tailor their suggestions to what you might not already know.
These discussions are intended to help you learn – so ask for the help you
feel you need so you get the suggestions you want and need.
The second section of the Evidence Worksheet asks you to describe the context
of the
lesson you are using for evidence collection. What is the long term learning
goal? What is the learning target? Remember, the learning target is what you
want the students to know and be able to do as a result of participating in
today’s learning experience. The learning target may be a culminating
learning target where students apply several previous targets.
The third section lists a series of questions that will help you analyze the
evidence for your teammates.
The fourth section asks you to think about how the evidence is in Student
Voice. Take time to fill out the Evidence Worksheet now for the evidence you
brought in. Don’t discuss this in a group at this time; work
individually. |
Building Your Understanding #3a:
Facilitator Instructions : This is the first time that the teams have seen the Evidence Worksheet. Explain to them that we will be using this for preparing to analyze our evidence for the audience (the team). By filling out the form they will be analyzing the evidence they are sharing in writing. When it is time for them to present their evidence, they will only need to read what is on their form. It is time for them to actually fill out the first step on the worksheet.
Now we need to practice giving each other feedback. The feedback sessions are loaded with protocols for building trust and positive collaborative learning communities. It is important that the participants follow the process. Everyone should now have a feedback form to look at as the slides describe the feedback process.
Play slides 50-52.
50 |
Evidence Feedback Worksheet
Purpose: Help one another learn how to gather credible and convincing evidence
|
Before we begin to share evidence with one another, we need to learn how to
give good feedback. The purpose of giving feedback is to help one another do a
better job of gathering and then presenting evidence next time. There are two
important things to remember in order that the giving of feedback builds trust
and the ability to work collaboratively. Tell the presenter what was credible
and convincing about the evidence. Then, if you are saying that the evidence
didn’t convince you, you must give the presenter concrete ideas for what
you would need to see in order to be convinced. We are not here to criticize,
so we DO NOT
point out what we didn’t like – we
DO
tell them what can be added to make it stronger.
To help us with this process we will use the Evidence Feedback Worksheet. You
should each have one of these forms to look at now. Let’s look at this
form. |
51 | Evidence Feedback Worksheet |
The first step on the form has the Descriptions of Practice. As the presenter
explains how the evidence demonstrates in what way the students are engaged in
the Descriptions of Practice and how the evidence demonstrates the elements of
quality evidence, you may circle the student behaviors that you will look for
in the evidence as the presenter does his or her analysis for you.
Then the presenter will share the actual evidence. Up to this point we have
not seen the evidence. As we view the evidence, we note what student behaviors
we see occurring in the evidence. We ask any questions to make sure we
understand the evidence.
At the conclusion of the evidence presentation, before we begin our group
discussion, everyone takes time to write out their individual own thoughts
about the quality of the evidence. Each person writes what they thought was
credible about the evidence and what they need to see to be more convinced.
The sheet guides you to frame all your responses so that you are not
criticizing the evidence but instead giving the presenter ideas of what they
could do to make the evidence stronger.
When everyone has recorded their own thoughts, each team member takes turns
reading what they wrote to the presenter. Only read what you actually wrote.
Remember to first tell them what was credible and strong. Then if you were not
convinced, you begin by saying, “what I would need to see to be more
convinced is…” and follow with your suggestion. Only say what more
needs to happen; do not justify your suggestions by saying what didn’t
happen. For example: I really liked that you used journals for Student Voice.
What I would need to see to be more convinced is the students responding to a
question like…
It is always more comfortable just to tell teammates that you think what they
did was great, and for sure you want to do this when it is appropriate –
but in order for them to learn, they need to get additional ideas. We call
these “STRETCH” suggestions. It is an important part of your
learning, as well as theirs, that you think of things they can try that are
new. Remember, giving feedback is about helping each other learn how to make
the evidence stronger – it is about helping each other grow and learn.
After each person gives their feedback, the others in the group also give their
opinions on the feedback that was given. New suggestions will occur as each
member of the team takes his or her turn. |
52 |
Building Your Understanding #3b: |
Let’s practice this process on the evidence Rick has brought in. After
you view the evidence, you may ask clarifying questions to make sure that you
understood the evidence. Then each person will write out their feedback. We
will share a few of the comments from the whole group, and then we can have a
group discussion. |
Building Your Understanding #3b:
Facilitator Instructions : Have everyone take their feedback form and individually write their impressions of the evidence. Remind them that their comments on what needs to improve to be more convincing needs to begin with “What I need to see to be more convinced is…” They should also include “STRETCH” suggestions that are other ideas the presenter could try.
Ask six or seven of the members of the entire group to share their written comments. Then ask the rest of the group if they would want to add anything to the comments. Add your own comments so you are modeling the type of comments that could be made to make the evidence stronger.
Play slide 53.
53 |
Building Your Understanding #3c:
|
OK – now we are ready to begin to practice this process.
The first step is the presenter will analyze the evidence for the team using
the Evidence Worksheet we just filled out. Remember, when you are analyzing
the evidence, you are not showing the evidence – just tell the team what
you wrote on your Evidence Worksheet.
The second step is to share the evidence and label and describe the components
of the evidence that are credible and convincing.
The third step is for each member of the team to write their individual
feedback on the feedback form. Do not talk during this time.
The fourth Step is for each team member to take turns reading what they wrote
on their feedback form. Start with what was credible about the evidence and
begin each suggestion with: “What I would need to see to be more
convinced is…” When each presenter is finished, the group gives them
the individual feedback forms.
Repeat this process until everyone in the group has presented their evidence
and received feedback. We will have a presentation coach, feedback coach, and
timer to help us stick to the protocols as we engage in the process.
The last step is for the presenter to reflect on the feedback given by the
group. Take a moment for the presenter to articulate how the feedback will
help him or her gather
and share evidence next time. Then we begin the process again with the next
presenter. |
Building Your Understanding Activity #3c
Facilitator Instructions : Everyone was supposed to come to this session with one piece of evidence for Description of Practice 1d1 in Student Voice. There will be examples that are strong and others that are very minimal. At this point in the learning process we accept all attempts and thank everyone for their effort and willingness to practice a new skill. What we are doing is learning together and helping each other increase our understanding and capacity to both provide the Descriptions of Practice and to gather and analyze evidence that demonstrates the degree to which the Descriptions of Practice are occurring in the classroom.
It is a natural inclination within the groups to want to talk about the lesson and content – all teachers love to do this . Let them know that they may do this, if they have time at the end of all the evidence sharing, but for our presenting and feedback sessions they need to stick to the protocols. If they get into each other’s lessons, it will take way too long. Remind them to stick with what they have written on the Evidence Worksheet.
To help the sharing sessions go smoothly and assure a climate of trust is built, we have coaching roles for the team members to play. These are the coaching roles: Presentation Coach, Feedback Coach, and Timer.
Ask the participants to take the envelope with the roles from the center of the table and distribute each role with three members. Then ask the Presentation Coach at each table to raise their hands. Select one to read what they will do to coach the others on the team. Repeat for each role. You will do this process before each sharing session every month. We are providing the cards for all the jobs at this time. We suggest you make up enough envelopes for each group with a full set in each. Collect them at the end of each sharing session so you have them for the next session.
Tell them they should hold the card so they remember to play their role throughout the process. Emphasize that we do intend for them to interrupt and remind team members, when necessary. Initially they are not used to interjecting during the process when the group goes off of protocol – but tell them that is what is expected to make the process work well. When you are observing, encourage them to do this.
P RESENTATION COACH
Purpose: Encourage presenter and keep team focused on understanding the evidence.
F EEDBACK C OACH
Purpose: Remind team members to be positive and encouraging and to focus on making the evidence stronger.
TIMER
Purpose: Keep everyone within their allotted time so everyone has their turn.
ANALYZING & PRESENTING EVIDENCE
GIVING MEANINGFUL FEEDBACK
Steps |
PRESENTER
Evidence Worksheet
|
FEEDBACK TEAM
Feedback Worksheet
|
1 |
I. VERBALLY ANALYZE
|
I. LISTEN
|
2 |
II. SHOW EVIDENCE
|
II. LOOK at Evidence presented
|
|
| |
3 |
III. LISTEN TO FEEDBACK * (Consider possibilities) | III.
WRITE FEEDBACK SILENTLY
IV. GIVE ORAL FEEDBACK
|
4 |
IV. REFLECT
| ( Listen to presenter’s reflection on what was meaningful to him/her.) |
Facilitator Instructions: Before you begin the process, check on the numbers within the groups. There should never be more than six people in the group, five is better. If the groups are less than four, combine them so that there are enough people to really give good comments and practice the process over and over. It is also critical that there are equal numbers of evidence within each group or one group will finish either way ahead or way after the others. One technique is to ask people with evidence to raise their hands and distribute them equally at the group tables.
Set Up: Each team member takes a green feedback sheet. You put the two roles in the middle of the table and two people volunteer to take those roles. After each person finishes their presentation/feedback session, shift the roles one person to the right. The person presenting should not have a role.
Review with everyone the process:
This session the discussions will take a very long time. Let them talk even if it does take longer, as this is the first opportunity to build comfort with one another. Each session we will tighten the reins on the timing which will cause them to become more and more concise. For your information, and not theirs, by the last session the entire group will share within 30 minutes. This time it could take as long as 1½ hours. That is typically what happens at this stage.
When the sharing sessions are finished:
Play slide 54 . (We need to have about 45 minutes left in the session at this point)
Facilitator Instructions : Remind them to use the attributes of good presentations and feedback to help them with the debriefing process.
54 |
Debriefing
Debriefing the presenting and feedback sessions:
Debriefing your learning:
Look at the Teacher’s Learning Record Rubric. Where are you in the
progression of learning?
What do you need to do differently next time to increase your evidence of
student engagement in 1d1? |
Debriefing Now that you have practiced the process in small groups, each team needs to debrief the presenting and feedback sessions you have just experienced. There are five questions for you to answer. Each of you should write your own responses. When all of you are finished, share your responses with the others in your group. Discuss each question as a group and come up with a consensus answer for each question. One person should be prepared to share your consensus with the whole group.
Debriefing the presenting and feedback sessions: 1. What went well in your presenting and feedback session? 2. What didn’t go as well as it should have? 3. What will you do differently next time to make the process go smoother?
Debriefing your learning:
Look at the Teacher’s Learning Record Rubric. Where are you in the
progression of learning?
What do you need to do differently next time to increase your evidence of
student engagement in the Descriptions of Practice?
|
Facilitator Instructions : One of the most important parts of this process is that the group thinks about their group process. Debriefing the process will help them develop team collaboration and cooperation. They need to take about five minutes to think about the processing and what went well and what didn’t go well. As a group they should discuss what was uncomfortable and what they need to do within their group to be sure everyone is comfortable and supported in the process.
The second part of the debriefing is for them to look at the rubric we provided in the Evidence Guidelines called Teacher’s Learning Record Rubric and indicate where they are in the progression of learning and what they need to do to move to the next level of performance.
First they think and write themselves. Then they share with the group and make one group list. When they have finished their individual group discussions, it is critical to have the whole group discussion so everyone hears each other. If they talk about challenges in their process, help them problem solve. Make a list of what they learned about things they could do differently in their classroom.
Debriefing
Now that you have practiced the process in small groups, each team needs to debrief the group presenting and feedback session they have just experienced.
First think and write yourself. Then share with the group and make one group list.
When you have finished the individual group discussions, it is critical to have the whole group discussion so everyone hears each other.
Debriefing the presenting and feedback sessions:
1. What went well in your presenting and feedback session?
2. What didn’t go as well as it should have?
3. What will you do differently next time to make the process go smoother?
Debriefing your learning:
Look at the Teacher’s Learning Record Rubric. Where are you in the progression of learning?
What do you need to do differently next time to increase your evidence of student engagement in 1d1?
Now we are ready to prepare for the next session. Make sure everyone has the new Evidence Worksheet.
Play slide 55.
Facilitator Instructions : Make sure they each have an Evidence Worksheet.
55a |
Assignment for next session:
Evidence Worksheet cont. |
Our assignment next time is for each person to bring in evidence of
Descriptions of Practice 1d1 and 1d2 in Student Voice. Everyone should have a
new Evidence Worksheet.
|
55b |
The Evidence Worksheet is structured to help you plan your evidence and prepare
your presentation of that evidence.
First describe what Descriptions of Practice are demonstrated in your evidence.
During your presentation, feel free to tell us how good you feel the evidence
is or isn’t and why – this is part of your analysis. The purpose of
the presentation is for you to analyze for your teammates where you are in your
ability to gather the evidence and for them to understand the evidence you
have brought in. In that way, they can gear their comments and tailor their
suggestions to what you might not already know. These discussions are intended
to help you learn – so ask for the help you feel you need so you get the
suggestions you want and need.
The second section of the Evidence Worksheet asks you to describe the context
of the lesson you are using for evidence collection. What is the long term
learning goal? What is the learning target? Remember, the learning target is
what you want the students to know and be able to do as a result of
participating in today’s learning experience. The learning target may be
a culminating learning target where students apply several previous targets.
The third section lists a series of questions that will both guide you in your
evidence collection and help you analyze the evidence you are bringing in for
your teammates. You may choose any content or lesson that you want.
The fourth section asks you to think about how your evidence is using the
elements of quality evidence. Remember your Evidence Guidelines examples.
OK – now you are ready to plan for the next session. Discuss a lesson
that you will be doing in the near future with your teammates and help each
other plan the evidence you could bring in next time. Before you leave this
session, it is our intent that you tried to fill out the Evidence Worksheet so
you are clear on what your evidence will look like. We suggest you work with
the students multiple times between this session and next. The evidence you
bring in may be different than the lesson you plan today. The purpose of
working with your team today is to be sure you understand the process of
planning your evidence. It is perfectly fine to change your decision if you
want to. The important thing is that you know how to use the planning sheet to
get the exact kind of evidence we are looking for. |
Facilitator Notes: Be sure to emphasize that 1d2: the progression to reach the targets is the progression of LEARNING, i.e., the things the students need to learn in order to reach the targets. IT IS NOT the directions to complete the assignment. This is the single most common mistake teachers make in their evidence for 1d2. They will bring in evidence that the students first read their text, then did the experiment, answered the questions on the handout, and discussed with each other. Those are directions to complete the task. If they have a learning target they are to say what the students need to LEARN to reach the target.
Play slide 56.
56 |
Outcome Session III
We have learned how to use the:
Evidence Worksheet - to help you plan your evidence. Bring with you next time all filled out so you are ready to do your presentation.
Evidence Feedback Worksheet - we will use this every session
Next session you will bring in evidence of TWO Descriptions of Practice in Student Voice |
Outcome for Session III
This session began the process of working in learning communities to help each
other learn how to gather, present, and give feedback on student evidence. We
have begun to practice processing student evidence in a way that will help us
learn how to work collaboratively to support the learning process school-wide.
Each session we use the Evidence Worksheet to plan your evidence and to analyze
your evidence for your team. We will not be filling this out in class as we
did today.
Each session we use the Evidence Feedback Worksheet to discuss the evidence and
help each other make the evidence stronger next time. Each session we will
become better and better at the process.
Your assignment for next session is to bring in evidence of TWO Descriptions of
Practice, in Student Voice. Practice working with your students on these
Descriptions of Practice several times between this session and the next.
Bring in your best evidence, not your only attempt. The more you practice with
your students between sessions, the more meaningful the learning will be for
you and your students. Everyone in your group will bring in evidence.
Remember, it is impossible to have the discussions without evidence –
check in with each other before the next session to make sure everyone is
coming with evidence. It is more important to bring in something to discuss
than to worry about it being perfect evidence. Just come, bring something, and
your group will help you make it into really great evidence.
Each session we will follow the same process as we used today and each session
we will become more and more skilled in the process. By the time we have done
this a few times, we will feel much more proficient in the process and be able
to do it very quickly.
|
Outcome Session III:
Facilitator Instructions : Make sure that everyone understands their assignment and feels competent to bring in the required evidence. If anyone has questions, they should first talk to a team member; if they still have questions, you will talk to them individually to make sure they feel good about what they are being asked to do for next time.
Be sure to tell them that it is not our expectation that they have mastered how to gather evidence at this time. They still should be feeling pretty insecure about the process but a little more clear than when they walked into this session. By the end of the next session they will feel pretty confident in their ability to gather evidence. The important thing is that they bring in something next time and show up for the group discussion.
SAMPLE EVIDENCE : This is a high school chemistry class. The students are all juniors. This lesson is a lab experiment. These are three students representing high, medium, and low performance in the classroom. We have done lab experiments before, but we focused mainly on proper use and respecting the lab equipment, safety, and clean up. This lesson is focusing on accuracy of experiments.
Description of Practice 1d1: can articulate the learning targets
Description of Practice 1d2: know what is needed to move to the next level of performance
Description of Practice 1d3: know how to access additional resources for support when needed
Script of audio evidence: (These are three students talking together)
I find it very useful that we get rubrics for each unit that we are studying and it really lays out what needs to be identified in our learning process, and I find that useful in organizing my way of learning. Here are the rubrics we are using today about doing experiments in lab. The first rubric tells us about doing quality experiments. The second rubric is about accurate results and today that means we have to determine Ph levels of liquids. Our learning target is always described and then what we need to do to reach the target is outlined in the rubric. Sometimes we create the rubrics in class so we all have helped decide how to get there. In each rubric we can easily identify what the targets are and what we need to do to reach the target. There are different parts of the learning target we need to pay attention to and the levels of performance. We use the rubrics to look at our work and know where we are in reaching the learning target.
Lots of times there are several steps to learn before we really get there. Even for the lab there is a direct procedure of what you have to do, and then we analyze all the data we have collected. Other times, we’re given here’s what you are trying to find and here are your resources - we are supposed to come up with our own strategy to solve the problem. At the end of each lesson there is a procedure of self-evaluation where we reflect on how close to the target we think we are. Here is my reflection. We keep these in our journal for the year with all the rubrics. All the learning targets we studied are all like right there with my reflections on my work. All of us kids have our own journals.
In lab, lab partners reflect on what we did, and we always go through if we had done this our results would have been more clear or our concept would have shown through more and the target we were going for would have been more easily identified, so that really helps us. We can always redo our lab project if we want to and if we think we will do it better the second time. Lab and experiments teach us about how to find out stuff about the world and finding out what we think is true is true. For each lab assignment there are troubleshooters. Our teacher always tells us to ask each other for help and if we need more help, there is a notebook at the back of the room with things we can do to locate stuff that will help us work through the problem.
When I get stuck, I know that I am first to ask another student. In our class we use other classmates as resources, and when we are working in groups, it really helps. You might be lost or not understand quite as well as someone else understands, so we ask each other to help better understand when we need to. Sometimes someone has an idea that gives you a bigger idea than you started with. If that doesn’t work, we have steps to use. The next step is that both of us are to go to the trouble shooting notebook; the last step is to ask the teacher.
The teacher presented the learning journals for the whole class.
Practice EVIDENCE WORKSHEET - SESSION III
Your evidence this session is of: D ESCRIPTION OF P RACTICE 1 D1 , in Student Voice.
You are gathering evidence of these
DESCRIPTIONS OF PRACTICE for Criterion 1d |
Evidence focus
|
Personalizing student behaviors
your evidence will demonstrate: |
1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets | Students describe
(1) their learning targets (2) why the learning is important to them (3) how they will demonstrate they have reached them |
Culminating Learning Target
III. A NALYZE FOR US THE SPECIFICS OF YOUR D ESCRIPTIONS OF P RACTICE :
For this lesson, the learning targets I want students to know are: (Indicate type of target: Content, Strategies, Thinking Development, Procedural, Investigative/Inquiry or Reflective) …
These learning targets are important and relevant to the students because…
The students will demonstrate how they will know they have reached the targets by…
IV. A NALYZE FOR US HOW THIS EVIDENCE IS IN S TUDENT V OICE….
VI. Y OUR TEAM WILL GIVE YOU F EEDBACK: Receive Feedback verbally and in writing on the Convincing and Credible nature of your evidence. Team members will give you “STRETCH” suggestions as well. Each team member will first give you their feedback verbally and then give you their written comments.
VII. R EFLECT : What do you feel you could do next time to make your evidence stronger or to provide stronger Descriptions of Practice for your students?
SAMPLE EVIDENCE WORKSHEET – SESSION III
Context: This is a high school chemistry class. The students are all juniors. These are three students representing high, medium, and low performance in the classroom. This lesson is a lab experiment. We have done lab experiments before, but we focused mainly on proper use and respecting the lab equipment, safety, and clean up. This lesson is focusing on accuracy of experiments.
I. A NALYSIS OF E VIDENCE: Verbally analyze your evidence
A. The Personalized Descriptions of Practice I am evidencing are: I am presenting evidence on 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3. The student behaviors you will see are:
You are gathering evidence of these
DESCRIPTIONS OF PRACTICE for Criterion 1d |
Evidence focus
|
Personalizing student behaviors
your evidence will demonstrate: |
1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets | Students describe
(1) their learning targets (2) why the learning is important to them (3) how they will demonstrate they have reached them |
1d2 Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance | Students
(1)articulate the progression of steps to reach the learning targets (2) identify, on their own, where they are in that progression (3) describe what they need to do to move to the next level of performance |
1d3 Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation,
acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate | Students are
(1) aware of the options to get support and access appropriate help, when needed (2) in their daily work, consistently utilizing the resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as is appropriate |
Clarifying your analysis : (Finish the following sentences)
1d1. As a result of this lesson, the learning targets I want students to know are… to know how to successfully conduct experiments and to understand that different liquids have different Ph levels. These Ph levels determine if the liquid is an acid or a base. They need to know that an acid has a Ph of less than 7 and a base has a Ph greater than 7.
This learning is important and relevant because…l earning about scientific experiments and what we can learn from them is an important life concept. When we hear people give us facts about different things we need to be able to determine if those facts were tested or if they are just opinions. The quality of the experiment others do affects the quality of the information of the results. Students need to be aware of this. It is also important that students know how to do their scientific experiments in order to confirm or test what they believe to be true or to find out new information. This learning is relevant for students because as a culture we are becoming more and more dependent on the use of scientific research and experiments to understand our world. We need to become thoughtful and knowledgeable consumers of information. We need to become thoughtful and knowledgeable consumers of information.
What I did to make sure the students knew the requirements to meet the lesson learning target was… talk about the desired outcome of our experiments and why it was important to do quality work during the experiment to get the necessary results. We talked about what it means to conduct a good experiment and how the quality of that experiment affects the results. If we do sloppy work, we get sloppy and inaccurate results. We discussed how this is applied to all experiments and today we would practice experiments by testing the Ph levels of various liquids. In the back of the room are notebooks for each experiment we will conduct. When they have completed their experiments, they should check their results for accuracy. If they didn’t get the correct results, they need to figure out what they did wrong and redo the experiment.
The students demonstrated they knew the lesson learning targets and what was required to meet them by… writing in their journals what the learning target was, how they conducted their experiment, and how they knew they conducted accurate and reliable experiments. All students keep a learning log or journal of what they did well, what they didn’t, and what they need to do differently next time. All assignments are kept in their learning journals and will represent the work of the whole course.
1d2. What I did to inform students of the progression of steps to meet the lesson learning target and how they indicate their next level of performance was … ; I gave them a rubric for conducting experiments. We discussed how this is applied to all experiments and would use it today on testing Ph levels. We have a different rubric for each unit. We go over the rubric with the whole class as we start each unit and refer to it daily throughout the unit. We also discuss how today’s learning target fits into the larger learning goal. We discuss the steps on the rubric and how they combine to accomplish the goal. This guides the students and provides each one with a concrete idea of what is to be learned and what they need to do to satisfactorily meet the learning targets. I label each of the particular steps we are working on and have then reflect on how they contribute to the bigger idea.
The way students will be able to determine, on their own, where they are in the progression of meeting the lesson learning target is…
Students reflect after the lab and discuss where they are in the progression of learning and what they need to do in order to improve next time. Regular reflection helps students see where they are and where they need to go to meet expected targets. Periodically I have students help create the rubric with the learning targets and clearly define what will be required of them to get there. This helps them better understand using a rubric, especially the ones I provide for our other units.
The way the students are explaining the level they are performing at and what they need to do to reach the next level is… Students write in their learning journal their reflections after the learning task. This includes where they are in the progression of learning: what they did well, what they didn’t do well, and what they need to do differently next time. This reflection is a regular part of what we do. I use this information as a means of assessing to what degree students learned the intended targets. All rubrics are kept in their learning journals and will represent the work of the whole course. Students refer to their rubrics and learning targets on a daily basis.
1d3. The resources I have available to the students when they need remediation or acceleration are… I expect students to use each other as their first resource. They really like it and it reinforces their understanding. I also provide troubleshooters for lab work which are in a Help Notebook in the back of the room for further resources. The last source is the teacher but they must have demonstrated that they tried the first two before asking the teacher.
The way students determine when they need to use those resources is… There is a poster on the board referred to the available resources. It describes that a peer student is their best resource. If neither student knows how to resolve the question, they both are to go to the troubleshooting notebooks together and try to locate the answer. If neither of them can find the answer, they may ask the teacher. We go over this protocol once a week.
The way students explained why and how they accessed those resources as well as how that resource met the needed support was… Through their reflections entered into the learning journals. When they reflect on the resources they include these three points: what the issue was, why they chose the resource or resources, how that did or did not answer their question.
B. This is evidence of Student Voice because…. t his evidence is in student voice because it is presented by the students themselves in their own words and actual voice. It is also Student Voice because the students have written in their own journals.
C. This is evidence of All Students because…A ll Students write in these learning journals that I have here for you to look at.
FEEDBACK WORKSHEET - SESSION III
I. L ISTEN TO THE ANALYSIS
II. L
OOK AT THE EVIDENCE
–
Ask clarifying questions.
Sample Clarification Questions:
III. W RITE FEEDBACK: Analyze the evidence in writing – silently.
What was CREDIBLE about the evidence? Verify the Element of Quality Evidence is present:
Evidence focus
|
Personalizing student behaviors
your evidence will demonstrate: |
1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets Notes from teacher presentation: |
Students describe (1) their learning targets (2) why the learning is important to them (3) how they will demonstrate they have reached them Notes from student evidence:
|
Is the shared evidence in Student Voice? Comments/feedback:
IV. W HAT DO YOU NEED TO SEE FOR THE EVIDENCE TO BE MORE CONVINCING?
Each member, in turn, gives the feedback to the presenter verbally. “What I need to see to be more convinced…” Make specific positive suggestions for improvement.
Possible Stretch Suggestions for 1d1:
EVIDENCE WORKSHEET - SESSION IV
Your evidence this session is of: D ESCRIPTIONS OF P RACTICE 1 D1 and 1d2 , in Student Voice.
I. T ELL US WHAT YOUR EVIDENCE IS DEMONSTRATING:
You are gathering evidence of these
DESCRIPTIONS OF PRACTICE for Criterion 1d |
Evidence focus
|
Personalizing student behaviors
your evidence demonstrates:
|
1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets | Students describe
(1) their learning targets (2) why the learning is important to them (3) how they will demonstrate they have reached them |
1d2 Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance | Students
(1)articulate the progression of steps to reach the learning targets (2) identify, on their own, where they are in that progression (3) describe what they need to do to move to the next level of performance |
II. T ELL US THE CONTEXT OF THE EVIDENCE:
Culminating Learning Target
III. A NALYZE FOR US THE SPECIFICS OF YOUR D ESCRIPTIONS OF P RACTICE :
For this lesson, the learning targets I want students to know are: (Indicate type of target: Content, Strategies, Thinking Development, Procedural, Investigative/Inquiry or Reflective) …
These learning targets are important and relevant to the students because…
The students will demonstrate how they will know they have reached the targets by…
The students will know the progression of learning to reach this target (This is not the directions to complete the assignment; it is the list of things they need to learn to master the target learning) by…
The students will tell us where they are in that progression by…
IV. A NALYZE FOR US HOW THIS EVIDENCE IS IN S TUDENT V OICE….
VI. Y OUR TEAM WILL GIVE YOU F EEDBACK: Receive Feedback verbally and in writing on the Convincing and Credible nature of your evidence. Team members will give you “STRETCH” suggestions as well. Each team member will first give you their feedback verbally and then give you their written comments.
VII. R EFLECT : What do you feel you could do next time to make your evidence stronger or to provide stronger Descriptions of Practice for your students?
S ESSION IV
Learning Target : Improve your evidence for 1d2.
You need to demonstrate : ability to participate in the presentation and feedback session; give stretch suggestions for 1d2; and plan evidence for 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3 in Student Voice.
Approximate time: 3 Hours
Materials needed:
Facilitator Notes: By this stage in the process, many of the participants will be experiencing what we call disequilibrium. We experience disequilibrium when we are confronted with information that disturbs what we believe to be true. Many times teachers have discovered that the students aren’t learning the content to the degree they thought they were before they began to collect evidence. In addition, they have begun to realize there is a lot they do not know about providing the Descriptions of Practice the students need to have. This session is designed to address this disequilibrium and equip them with a deeper understanding of how to engage students in the Descriptions of Practice to help the students really learn and not just participate in the assignment. Their learning target for today is to learn how to give good stretch suggestions for 1d2.
Play slides 57-58.
Slide # |
Slide Script |
Narrative on slide
|
57 |
Session IV
Our goal in practicing how to gather and analyze evidence is to learn how to
have quality evidence. These sessions will help you present quality evidence
at your culminating seminar. |
Our goal in practicing how to gather and analyze evidence is to learn how to
have quality evidence. You will need to present quality evidence that you have
engaged your students in the criterion for Professional Certification at your
culminating seminar. These sessions will help you present quality evidence.
An important part of the process is having the ability to analyze your own evidence and the evidence of others. In addition, we need to develop the skills to give feedback as to the quality of that evidence. To improve our ability to give suggestions for improving the evidence, we are going to take some time to increase our understanding of personalizing student learning. Then we will look at the evidence we have brought in today and practice giving what we call “STRETCH” suggestions to increase the degree to which personalizing student learning is occurring within the evidence. |
58 |
Continuum chart
See below | You have arrived today with your evidence of TWO Descriptions of Practice, in Student Voice. Each session you will have a little better idea of what your evidence needs to look like and what to expect in each session. Each time you go through the feedback process, your ideas on how to help one another will improve and eventually you will all feel very comfortable with the process. You can see by the continuum where we are in that process. |
Continuum Chart
Beginning – III |
Practicing - IV
|
Practicing- V |
Mastery - VI |
|
|
|
|
Facilitator Instructions : Stop and discuss the chart on the screen. We are just at the second stage on the continuum of learning. By the end of this session they will feel more equipped to provide the new learning the students need to have. Even though many participants are feeling unsure and uncomfortable right now, encourage them to stick with the process as the insecurity and frustration they may be feeling will pass. There will be huge benefits for us individually and as a staff as we move through this uncomfortable stage. If we think of this as an adventure and realize that the benefits will occur quickly without huge efforts or time expended, it can be exciting. Look at where we will be next time - next time we already will have traveled a long way in the learning process. You can see that today we need to learn how to give STRETCH suggestions.
Play slide 59. Refer the participants back to the Evidence Guidelines explanations if they need them.
59 |
Your learning target:
Give good stretch suggestions | Last session we spent time improving our ability to gather evidence on 1d1. Today you were to bring in evidence of 1d1 and 1d2 in Student Voice. This session your learning target is to learn how to give good stretch suggestions for 1d2. We will use the information given to us in the Evidence Guidelines in giving our stretch suggestions. Let’s review the information given to us in the Evidence Guidelines. |
60 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #4a
1d2: Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance
|
1d2.
Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance
We want the students to be able to tell us which of today’s skills they understand and can apply, which ones they almost have but aren’t too sure about, and which ones they don’t get at all. This is a key feature to personalizing student learning. We want the students to be able to describe and explain their learning so that we know from them what they have understood and can do. Oftentimes students can actually be successful on an assignment by carefully following the directions from the teacher without really understanding what it is they are doing. By engaging students in a process to describe what they understand and are able to do, we know the reality of what they have gained from today’s learning experience. |
61 |
Picture of sample rubrics | Remember that the progression of learning is not the directions to complete the assignment. The progression refers to what they need to learn to reach the targets. There are many ways to show the progression of learning to reach the learning targets. Rubrics are one way. The greatest use of progression in rubrics is to increase the depth of the learning in each level. Look at the sample rubric. Think about this as you view each other’s evidence in terms of what you might suggest they do to increase the depth of their rubrics. |
62 |
Picture of target
| Rubrics are only one way of showing progressions. You can make check lists or a simple listing on the board. A popular way to show progressions are with bull’s-eye targets. Many times teachers use one bull’s eye to express the content progression and another to increase depth, such as depth of thinking used. It is possible to combine the scores from the combined levels for the student grade. That allows the student to speak to both their content acquisition as well as their ability to think deeply about it. Think about this as you view each other’s evidence in terms of what you might suggest they do to increase depth of learning – this would be a good stretch suggestion. |
63 |
Example of Depth
| Your Evidence Guidelines gives you three examples of depth. Review one or two together to understand how the depth is increasing for each kind of learning target. There is nothing particularly wonderful about these depth progressions ; these are just good examples. It would be best if you made your own progressions. Think about using these when it comes time for you to come up with “stretch” suggestions. |
Everyone should have an Evidence Feedback Worksheet and the sample evidence presentation handout. They are to read the presentation and record the information on the Feedback Worksheet. Then they are to watch the video of the evidence and record their feedback.
Play slide 64.
64a |
Building Understanding #4b: Watch the presentation of the evidence
Write your feedback
In table groups share your feedback – everyone must give stretch suggestions.
As a group put your feedback together and have one person share your group feedback. |
Use your feedback sheet to record the important information from the
presentation. Then view the evidence on the video and make notes of your
feedback as to the match between the presentation and the evidence. What is
strong about the evidence? What is missing in order for you to become
convinced that the students are engaged in the Descriptions of Practice 1d1 and
1d2?
Video of evidence |
64b | Now in table groups share your feedback on the evidence. Then as a group discuss what might be good stretch suggestions for this evidence. We will have each table function summarize their feedback and stretch suggestions. |
Facilitator Instructions: First the participants will see the presentation and make notes on their evidence feedback sheets. Then there will be video evidence. The participants should take notes as to the match between the presentation and the evidence. Then have them discuss their feedback in table groups and then as a group come up with good “stretch” suggestions.
65 |
Building Your Understanding #4c:
|
OK – now we are ready to begin to practice this process.
The first step is the presenter will analyze the evidence for the team using
the Evidence Worksheet we just filled out. Remember, when you are analyzing
the evidence, you are not showing the evidence – just tell the team what
you wrote on your Evidence Worksheet.
The second step is to share the evidence and label and describe the components
of the evidence that are credible and convincing.
The third step is for each member of the team to write their individual
feedback on the feedback form. Do not talk during this time.
The fourth Step is for each team member to take turns reading what they wrote
on their feedback form. Start with what was credible about the evidence and
begin each suggestion with: “What I would need to see to be more
convinced is…” When each presenter is finished, the group gives them
the individual feedback forms.
Repeat this process until everyone in the group has presented their evidence
and received feedback. We will have a presentation coach, feedback coach, and
timer to help us stick to the protocols as we engage in the process.
The last step is for the presenter to reflect on the feedback given by the
group. Take a moment for the presenter to articulate how the feedback will
help him or her gather
and share evidence next time. Then we begin the process again with the next
presenter. |
Facilitator Notes: Remember to review the coaching roles so the sharing sessions go smoothly and assure a climate of trust is built. These are the coaching roles: Presentation Coach, Feedback Coach, and Timer.
Ask the participants to take the envelope with the roles from the center of the table and distribute each role with three members. Then ask the presentation coach at each table to raise their hands. Select one to read what they will do to coach the others on the team. Repeat for each role.
Once the roles have been reviewed, they are ready to begin their sharing sessions.
Facilitator Instructions : When the sharing sessions are completed, you are ready for the debriefing (we need to have about 45 minutes left in the session at this point).
Facilitator Instructions : Remind them to use the attributes of good presentations and feedback to help them with the debriefing process.
At this stage of the training you do not need to play the slide. Simply remind them of the process: each person fills out individually, then share with the group, collaborate on what you will report to the whole group. Slide 66 is here in the event you feel it is appropriate to play it.
Optional to play Slide 66.
66 |
Debriefing
Debriefing the presenting and feedback sessions:
Debriefing your learning:
Look at the Teacher’s Learning Record Rubric. Where are you in the
progression of learning?
What do you need to do differently next time to increase your evidence of
student engagement in 1d1, and 1d2? |
Debriefing Now that you have practiced the process in small groups, each team needs to debrief the presenting and feedback sessions you have just experienced. There are five questions for you to answer. Each of you should write your own responses. When all of you are finished, share your responses with the others in your group. Discuss each question as a group and come up with a consensus answer for each question. One person should be prepared to share your consensus with the whole group.
Debriefing the presenting and feedback sessions: 1. What went well in your presenting and feedback session? 2. What didn’t go as well as it should have? 3. What will you do differently next time to make the process go smoother?
Debriefing your learning:
Look at the Teacher’s Learning Record Rubric. Where are you in the
progression of learning?
What do you need to do differently next time to increase your evidence of
student engagement in the Descriptions of Practice? |
Facilitator Instructions : One of the most important parts of this process is that the group thinks about their group process. Debriefing the process will help them develop team collaboration and cooperation. They need to take about five minutes to think about the processing and what went well and what didn’t go well. As a group they should discuss what was uncomfortable and what they need to do within their group to be sure everyone is comfortable and supported in the process.
The second part of the debriefing is for them to look at the rubric we provided in the Evidence Guidelines called Teacher’s Learning Record Rubric and indicate where they are in the progression of learning and what they need to do to move to the next level of performance.
First they think and write themselves. Then they share with the group and make one group list. When they have finished their individual group discussions, it is critical to have the whole group discussion so everyone hears each other. If they talk about challenges in their process, help them problem solve.
Debriefing
Now that you have practiced the process in small groups, each team needs to debrief the group presenting and feedback session they have just experienced.
First think and write yourself. Then share with the group and make one group list.
When you have finished the individual group discussions, it is critical to have the whole group discussion so everyone hears each other.
Debriefing the presenting and feedback sessions:
1. What went well in your presenting and feedback session?
2. What didn’t go as well as it should have?
3. What will you do differently next time to make the process go smoother?
Debriefing your learning:
Look at the Teacher’s Learning Record Rubric. Where are you in the progression of learning?
What do you need to do differently next time to increase your evidence of student engagement in 1d1, and 1d2?
Facilitator Instructions: Make sure everyone has a new Evidence Worksheet before starting slide 68.
Play slide 67-68.
67 |
Assignment for next session:
Evidence Worksheet cont. |
Our assignment next time is for each person to bring in evidence of all THREE
Descriptions of Practice in Student Voice, demonstrating All Students are
engaged in 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3. Everyone should have a new Evidence Worksheet.
Before you fill out the Evidence Worksheet, let’s look closer at
Description of Practice 1d3.
|
68 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #4d
1d3:
Students
know how to access additional resources for support when needed
|
1d3:
Students
know how to access additional resources for support when needed
|
Facilitator Notes: At this point in the training the participants may not need to see the slide. Just orally review the step, have them take time to fill it out for next time and discuss with one another their plans, then go on to the Outcome of Session IV on Slide 69.
69
| Evidence Worksheet |
The Evidence Worksheet is structured to help you plan your evidence and prepare
your presentation of that evidence.
First describe what Descriptions of Practice are demonstrated in your evidence.
During your presentation, feel free to tell us how good you feel the evidence
is or isn’t and why – this is part of your analysis. The purpose of
the presentation is for you to analyze for your teammates where you are in
your ability to gather the evidence and for them to understand the evidence you
have brought in. In that way, they can gear their comments and tailor their
suggestions to what you might not already know. These discussions are intended
to help you learn – so ask for the help you feel you need so you get the
suggestions you want and need.
The second section of the Evidence Worksheet asks you to describe the context
of the lesson you are using for evidence collection. What is the long term
learning goal? What is the learning target? Remember, the learning target is
what you want the students to know and be able to do as a result of
participating in today’s learning experience. The learning target may be
a culminating learning target where students
apply several previous targets.
The third section lists a series of questions that will both guide you in your
evidence collection and help you analyze the evidence you are bringing in for
your teammates. You may choose any content or lesson that you want.
The fourth section asks you to think about how your evidence is using the
elements of quality evidence. Remember your Evidence Guidelines examples.
OK – now you are ready to plan for the next session. Discuss a lesson
that you will be doing in the near future with your teammates and help each
other plan the evidence you could bring in next time. Before you leave this
session, it is our intent that you tried to fill out the Evidence Worksheet so
you are clear on what your evidence will look like. We suggest you work with
the students multiple times between this session and next. The evidence you
bring in may be different than the lesson you plan today. The purpose of
working with your team today is to be sure you understand the process of
planning your evidence. It is perfectly fine to change your decision if you
want to. The important thing is that you know how to use the planning sheet to
get the exact kind of evidence we are looking for. |
Play slide 70.
70 |
Outcome Session IV
Come to the next session with your Evidence Worksheet completed with your analysis of how your evidence is demonstrating all THREE Descriptions of Practice, in Student Voice demonstrating ALL Students. |
Outcome for Session IV
Next session you will come with your Evidence Worksheet completed with your
analysis of how your evidence is demonstrating all THREE Descriptions of
Practice, in Student Voice demonstrating ALL Students. Practice working with
your students on these Descriptions of Practice several times between this
session and the next. Bring in your best evidence, not your only attempt. The
more you practice between sessions, the more meaningful the learning will be
for you and your students. Everyone in your group will bring in evidence.
Remember, it is not possible to have the discussions without evidence –
check in with each other before the next session to make sure everyone is
coming with evidence.
Each session we will follow the same process as we used today, and each session
we will become more and more skilled in the process. By the time we have done
this a few times, we will feel very proficient in the process and be able to
do it very quickly.
|
Outcome Session IV:
Facilitator Instructions : Make sure that everyone understands their assignment and feels competent to bring in the required evidence. If anyone has questions, they should first talk to a team member; if they still have questions, you will talk to them individually to make sure they feel good about what they are being asked to do for next time.
Be sure to tell them that it is not our expectation that they have mastered how to gather evidence at this time. They still should be feeling pretty insecure about the process, but a little more clear than when they walked into this session. By the end of the next session, they will feel pretty confident in their ability to gather evidence. The important thing is that they bring in something next time and show up for the group discussion.
EVIDENCE PRESENTATION SAMPLE - SESSION IV
This is to be read before viewing the video evidence.
Your evidence this session is of: D ESCRIPTIONS OF P RACTICE 1D1 AND 1D2 , in Student Voice.
I. T ELL US WHAT YOUR EVIDENCE IS DEMONSTRATING:
You are gathering evidence of these
DESCRIPTIONS OF PRACTICE for Criterion 1d |
Evidence focus
|
Personalizing student behaviors
your evidence will demonstrate: |
1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets | Students describe
(1) their learning targets (2) why the learning is important to them (3) how they will demonstrate they have reached them |
1d2 Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance | Students
(1)articulate the progression of steps to reach the learning targets (2) identify, on their own, where they are in that progression (3) describe what they need to do to move to the next level of performance |
II. T ELL US THE CONTEXT OF THE EVIDENCE: this is a ninth grade English class. We watched a movie and then the students were to choose something that could be learned from the movie and write an opinion paper with evidence.
Culminating Learning Target
Complete a five paragraph opinion paper with strong evidence to support it and write your own reflection on the quality of the paper.
III. A NALYZE FOR US THE SPECIFICS OF YOUR D ESCRIPTIONS OF P RACTICE :
For this lesson, the learning targets I want students to know are: (Indicate type of target: Content, Strategies, Thinking Development, Procedural, Investigative/Inquiry or Reflective) … application of the reflective process and the content of writing effective opinion paper with evidence. The students were in groups of four, they had the rubrics, and they reflected on each other’s papers with the intent of giving suggestions to make the papers stronger.
These learning targets are important and relevant to the students because… organization of our writing reflects the organization of our thoughts. When trying to convey opinions to others, having evidence that supports and give credence to our opinions is an important element and this was a requirement of the paper.
The students will demonstrate how they will know they have reached the targets by… participating in the discussion and using the rubrics to guide their comments to one another.
The students will know the progression of learning to reach this target (This is not the directions to complete the assignment; it is the list of things they need to learn to master the target learning) by… The students have a rubric that we created together it lists the learning that must be represented in the paper. These were: Strong Introduction, Body with supporting evidence, Maintained Focus on the topic throughout, and a good Title. The skills are listed in a progression of depth of the learning demonstrating level of thinking used.
The students will tell us where they are in that progression and what they need to do to move to the next level of performance by… In the discussions the students rate each of the components of the learning from the rubric and justify why they gave it that marking. They are also to give suggestions of what can be done to make the paper stronger.
IV. A NALYZE FOR US HOW THIS EVIDENCE IS IN S TUDENT V OICE…. The evidence is in student voice because it is a video of the student discussions.
VI. Y OUR TEAM WILL GIVE YOU F EEDBACK: Receive Feedback verbally and in writing on the Convincing and Credible nature of your evidence. Team members will give you “STRETCH” suggestions as well. Each team member will first give you their feedback verbally and then give you their written comments.
R EFLECT : What do you feel you could do next time to make your evidence stronger or to engage your students deeper in the Descriptions of Practice?
FEEDBACK WORKSHEET for Session IV
I. L ISTEN TO THE ANALYSIS
II. LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE
– Ask clarifying questions.
Clarification Questions:
III. W RITE FEEDBACK: Analyze the evidence in writing – silently.
What was CREDIBLE about the evidence? Verify the Element of Quality Evidence is present:
Evidence focus
|
Personalizing student behaviors
your evidence will demonstrate:
|
1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets
Notes from teacher presentation: | Students describe
(1) their learning targets (2) why the learning is important to them (3) how they will demonstrate they have reached them Notes from student evidence:
|
1d2 Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance
Notes from teacher presentation: | Students
(1)articulate the progression of steps to reach the learning targets (2) identify, on their own, where they are in that progression (3) describe what they need to do to move to the next level of performance Notes from student evidence:
|
Is the shared evidence in student voice ? Comments/feedback:
IV. W HAT DO YOU NEED TO SEE FOR THE EVIDENCE TO BE MORE CONVINCING?
Each member, in turn, gives the feedback to the presenter verbally. “What I need to see to be more convinced…” Make specific positive suggestions for improvement.
V. What “STRETCH” suggestions can you offer?
Possible Stretch Suggestions:
1d2
EVIDENCE WORKSHEET for SESSION V
Your evidence this session is of: D ESCRIPTIONS OF P RACTICE 1 D1 , 1d2 and 1d3 , in Student Voice, and that ALL STUDENTS are engaged in the Descriptions of Practice.
I. T ELL US WHAT YOUR EVIDENCE IS DEMONSTRATING:
You are gathering evidence of these
DESCRIPTIONS OF PRACTICE for Criterion 1d |
Evidence focus
|
Personalizing student behaviors
your evidence will demonstrate:
|
1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets | Students describe
(1) their learning targets (2) why the learning is important to them (3) how they will demonstrate they have reached them |
1d2 Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance | Students
(1)articulate the progression of steps to reach the learning targets (2) identify, on their own, where they are in that progression (3) describe what they need to do to move to the next level of performance |
1d3 Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation,
acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate |
Students are (1) aware of the options to get support and access appropriate help, when needed (2) in their daily work, consistently utilizing the resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as is appropriate |
II. T ELL US THE CONTEXT OF THE EVIDENCE:
Culminating Learning Target
III. A NALYZE FOR US THE SPECIFICS OF YOUR D ESCRIPTIONS OF P RACTICE :
For this lesson, the learning targets I want students to know are: (Indicate type of target: Content, Strategies, Thinking Development, Procedural, Investigative/Inquiry or Reflective) …
These learning targets are important and relevant to the students because…
The students will demonstrate how they will know they have reached the targets by…
The students will know the progression of learning to reach this target (This is not the directions to complete the assignment; it is the list of things they need to learn to master the target learning) by…
The students will tell us where they are in that progression and what they need to do to move to the next level by…
How will the students tell us what resources they are accessing if they either haven’t learned what is required or need to go beyond what is required?
IV. a) A NALYZE FOR US HOW THIS EVIDENCE IS IN S TUDENT V OICE….
b) A N ALYZE FOR US HOW THIS EVIDENCE IS A LL S TUDENTS…
S ESSION V
Learning Target: Improve your evidence for 1d3.
You need to demonstrate : ability to participate in the presentation and feedback session; give stretch suggestions for 1d3; and plan evidence for 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3 in Student Voice, demonstrating All Students; try evidence in another context.
Approximate time: 3 Hours
Materials needed:
Facilitator Notes : FROM THIS POINT ON IN THE TRAINING, ANY SLIDES YOU WISH TO EITHER TALK YOUR WAY THROUGH OR ENGAGE THE PARTICIPANTS IN THEIR OWN REVIEW, RATHER THAN PLAY THE SLIDES, THAT IS ADVISED. ALL THE SLIDES ARE INCLUDED FOR THE SCRIPT AS WELL AS IN THE EVENT THEY ARE NEEDED.
Facilitator Instructions : Place Evidence Feedback Worksheets in middle of tables.
Play slides 71-72.
Slide # |
Slide Script
|
Narrative on slide |
71a |
Session V: Learning and Practicing How to Gather Quality Evidence
We are continuing our work together to learn how to gather and present quality
evidence in fulfillment of your Professional Certification requirements.
Purpose of this session:
Learn to analyze the credible and convincing nature of evidence
|
Welcome back. We are continuing our work together to learn how to gather and
analyze quality evidence. This practice will help you gather and present
quality evidence in fulfillment of your Professional Certification requirements
at your culminating seminar.
|
71b
| The purpose of this session is to learn how to gather and analyze evidence; it is important that the quality of the evidence is credible and convincing. First, each team member needs to develop the ability to analyze their own evidence. Second, we learn to give analytical feedback to others on the presented evidence. When giving feedback to others, we all are practicing and honing our skills of gathering and analyzing quality evidence. Through this process we are developing into a cooperative and supportive learning community. We use the five elements of quality evidence for this analysis. | |
72 |
Continuum chart
See below | We are continuing our practice to learn how to gather, analyze, present, and give meaningful feedback on the evidence each participant has brought with them. You have arrived today with your evidence of THREE Descriptions of Practice, in Student Voice demonstrating All Students are engaged in 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3. Each time you have a little better idea of what your evidence needs to look like and what to expect in each session. Each time you go through the feedback process, your ideas on how to help one another will improve and eventually you will all feel very comfortable with the process. You can see by the continuum where we are in that process. |
Continuum Chart
Beginning – III |
Practicing - IV |
Practicing- V
|
Mastery - VI |
|
|
|
|
Facilitator Instructions : Stop and discuss the chart on the screen. We are at the third stage on the continuum of learning. They will begin to feel pretty sure of the process after the session today. Today we will practice as a whole group the presentation and feedback session. We are focusing our attention on learning how to give good feedback. Then we will practice the presenting and feedback session again in our learning community groups with the evidence the participants have brought in. As we continue practicing our skills, our ability to go faster will increase. There will be huge benefits for us individually and as a staff as we move to having the ability to share our evidence and receive feedback as a normal part of a staff meeting. Each session we shorten the sharing session time. This time our sharing and feedback session will take one hour. Look at where we will be next time - next time we already will have traveled a long way in the learning process.
73 |
Building Your Understanding Activity 5a:
Evidence Worksheet |
Each member of the team has come today with their Evidence Worksheet filled
out. This form is for the presenter to plan their analysis of the evidence
they are going to present to the team. Let’s review how to use this form:
First, you tell the team the THREE Descriptions your evidence is demonstrating
and the specific student behaviors they will see in the evidence you brought
in today. Second, place your evidence in the big picture context for the
student learning.
Third, analyze your evidence using the series of questions. You may always tell
us how good you feel the evidence is or isn’t and why. Today really
focus on 1d3 as this is the first time we are bringing in evidence for that
Description of Practice.
Fourth, describe in what way you feel this is good evidence of Student Voice,
how the evidence demonstrates that ALL students are practicing the specific
student behaviors.
Let’s review Description of Practice 1d3 before we go on.
|
74 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #4d
1d3:
Students
know how to access additional resources for support when needed
|
1d3:
Students
know how to access additional resources for support when needed
|
Facilitator Instructions: Seat the participants in a “fish bowl” fashion. If you have a large group, you may have multiple “fish bowls.” A “fish bowl” is seating five or six people at a table and then seating another five or six people in a circle around the people at the table. The inside group are the active participants and the outside group are the “ observers” and “debriefers.” Now review the attributes of a good presentation that we created last time. We will be listening to another presentation on the video tape. Our main focus will be on giving good feedback to the evidence. The inside group will be the group giving the feedback. The outside group will have the role cards. They will be monitoring the feedback session. The roles you need to assign are presentation coach, feedback coach, and timer.
Play slide 75.
75 |
Practicing Presentation of Evidence
Step One: Describe the way the Descriptions of Practice are demonstrated in the evidence
Step Two: Describe the way the evidence is in Student Voice and that All Students are engaged in Descriptions of Practice. |
Let’s view a presentation being given by a teacher and then analyze the
presentation. Listen for the components of a good presentation:
Step One: Describe the way the Descriptions of Practice are demonstrated in the
evidence.
Step Two: Describe the way the evidence is in Student Voice and that All
Students are engaged in the Descriptions of Practice.
Play presentation video clip
|
Facilitator Instructions: Review with the whole group the attributes of a good presentation and how those attributes were present in this presentation. In order to give feedback on the evidence that the teacher will give, we need to know how to use the feedback form. AT THIS STAGE IN THE TRAINING THE PARTICIPANTS MAY NOT NEED TO HAVE THE REVIEW OF HOW TO FILL OUT THE EVIDENCE FEEDBACK WORKSHEET. ASK THEM. IF THEY DO, WE HAVE INCLUDED Slides 76-77 FOR THAT REVIEW. If not, skip to Slide 78 to see the evidence we will do feedback on.
Play slides 76-77.
76 |
Evidence Feedback Worksheet Purpose: Help one another learn how to gather credible and convincing evidence
|
Each session we will practice using the feedback form. Everyone on the team
fills out a Feedback Worksheet for each evidence presentation. Remember, the
purpose of giving feedback is to help one another do a better job of gathering
and then presenting evidence next time. Let’s remember to first tell the
presenter what was convincing and strong about their evidence. Second, if you
were not convinced by the presented evidence, you must give the presenter
concrete ideas for what you would need to see in order to be convinced. We are
not here to criticize so we do not point out what we didn’t like –
we do tell them what needs to be added in order to make the evidence stronger
and more convincing. |
77 |
Evidence Feedback Worksheet
|
The first step on the form has the Descriptions of Practice. Everyone on the
team has a blank Feedback Worksheet for each presenter. As the presenter
explains how the evidence demonstrates in what way the students are engaged in
the Descriptions of Practice and how the evidence demonstrates Quality
Evidence, you may circle the student behaviors that you will look for in the
evidence as the presenter does his or her analysis for you.
Then the presenter will share the actual evidence. Up to this point, we have
not seen the evidence. As we view the evidence, we note what the presenter
says we should see in the evidence. The presenter will then show us the
evidence. We ask any questions to make sure we understand the evidence.
At the conclusion of the evidence presentation, before we begin our group
discussion, everyone takes time to write out their individual own thoughts
about the quality of the evidence. Each person writes what they thought was
credible about the evidence and what they need to see to be more convinced.
The sheet guides you to frame all your responses so that you are not
criticizing the evidence but instead giving the presenter ideas of what they
could do to make the evidence stronger.
When everyone has recorded their own thoughts, each team member takes turns
reading what they wrote to the presenter. Only read what you actually wrote.
Remember to first tell them what was credible and strong. Then if you were not
convinced, you begin by saying, “what I would need to see to more
convinced is…” and follow with your suggestion. Only say what more
needs to happen; do not justify your suggestions by saying what didn’t
happen. For example: I really liked that you used journals for Student Voice.
What I would need to see to be more convinced is the students responding to a
question like…
It is always more comfortable just to tell teammates that you think what they
did was great, and for sure you want to do this when it is appropriate –
but in order for them to learn, they need to get additional ideas. We call
these “STRETCH” suggestions. It is an important part of your
learning, as well as theirs, that you think of things they can try that are
new. Remember, giving feedback is about helping each other learn how to make
the evidence stronger – it is about helping each other grow and learn.
After each person gives their feedback, the others in the group also give their
opinions on the feedback that was given. New suggestions will occur as each
member of the team takes his or her turn. |
78 |
Building Your Understanding #5b: |
Let’s practice this process on the evidence the teacher has brought in.
After you view the evidence, you may ask clarifying questions to make sure that
you understood the evidence. Then each person will write out their feedback.
We will practice a feedback session with our whole group together.
|
Building Your Understanding #5b:
Facilitator Instructions: The group is set up in a fishbowl configuration with an inner circle and an outer circle. The outside circle will take the role cards; hand out all four. Encourage the outside circle with the role cards to intervene and make sure the process goes as it should; they are watching to make sure the process protocols are observed. The outside circle will be the observers and recorders. They should observe and record additional feedback and “ STRETCH” points. The inside circle will be the active participants. First everyone will individually write their feedback. The group on the inside circle will then share their written comments. When the inside circle is finished, the outside circle is asked if they have additional comments. Add your own comments so you are modeling the type of comments that could be made to make the evidence stronger. Now you are ready to play the evidence clip.
Play slide 79.
79 | Video clip |
Play the evidence video clip |
Facilitator Instructions: Now they are ready to get into their own groups and do their own evidence presentation and feedback sessions.
Everyone was supposed to come to this session with one piece of evidence for Three Descriptions of Practice in Student Voice. There will be examples that are strong and others that are in the process of becoming stronger – all evidence should be fairly solid by this time. We still accept all attempts and thank everyone for their effort and willingness to practice a new skill. Remind them that the main focus is that we are learning together and helping each other increase our understanding and capacity to both provide the Descriptions of Practice and to gather evidence that it is occurring in the classroom. AT THIS STAGE OF THE TRAINING IF YOU WISH TO SIMPLY HAND OUT THE COACHING ROLES AND RANDOMLY ASK THE PERSON’S HAVING EACH ROLE TO REVIEW WHAT THEY ARE TO DO – THAT WILL BE ENOUGH OF AN INTRODUCTION TO THE PROCESS. If you feel they need to have the next slide for review, it is included here.
Optional to play slide 80.
80 |
Building Your Understanding #5c:
|
OK – now we are ready to begin to practice this process.
The first step is the presenter will analyze the evidence for the team using
the Evidence Worksheet we just filled out. Remember when you are analyzing the
evidence, you are not showing the evidence – just tell the team what you
wrote on your Evidence Worksheet.
The second step is to share the evidence and label and describe the components
of the evidence that are credible and convincing.
The third step is for each member of the team to write their individual
feedback on the feedback form. Do not talk during this time.
The fourth step is for each team member to take turns reading what they wrote
on their feedback form. Start with what was credible about the evidence and
begin each suggestion with: “What I would need to see to be more
convinced is…” When each presenter is finished, the group gives them
the individual feedback forms.
Repeat this process until everyone in the group has presented their evidence
and received feedback. We will have a presentation coach, feedback coach, and
timer to help us stick to the protocols as we engage in the process.
The last step is for the presenter to reflect on the feedback given by the
group. Take a moment for the presenter to articulate how the feedback will
help him or her gather
and share evidence next time. Then we begin the process again with the next
presenter. |
Building Your Understanding Activity #5c:
Facilitator Instructions:
1) Remember to review the coaching roles so the sharing sessions go smoothly and assure a climate of trust is built. These are the coaching roles: Presentation Coach, Feedback Coach, and Timer. Ask the participants to take the envelope with the roles from the center of the table and distribute each role with three members. Then ask the presentation coach at each table to raise their hands. Select one to read what they will do to coach the others on the team. Repeat for each role. Once the roles have been reviewed, they are ready to begin their sharing sessions.
Remind them to stick with the material they wrote on the Evidence Worksheet.
2) Go around to each table as the discussions are occurring. Be careful to listen and not interfere with the flow – but do help to put them on track, if they are off track. The tendency to bird-walk into discussions about the lesson should now be almost non-existent. As you are walking around, if you see this happening, bring them back on task. As you do those “ walk-throughs,” be sure to ask if they have questions or want clarification.
This session the discussions need to become more direct and shorter. Keep reminding them to focus on the elements and how to make them occur stronger in the evidence. Each session we are tightening the reins on the timing which causes them to become more and more concise. For your information, and not theirs, by the last session the entire group will share within 30 minutes. This time, limit the session to 60 minutes.
Facilitator Instructions: When the sharing session is over, it is time for the debriefing.
At this stage of the training you do not need to play the slide. Simply remind them of the process: each person fills out individually, then share with the group, collaborate on what you will report to the whole group. Slide 81 is here in the event you feel it is appropriate to play it.
Optional to play slide 81.
81 |
Debriefing Debriefing the presenting and feedback sessions:
Debriefing your learning:
Look at the Teacher’s Learning Record Rubric. Where are you in the
progression of learning?
What do you need to do differently next time to increase your evidence of
student engagement in 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3? |
Debriefing Now that you have practiced the process in small groups, each team needs to debrief the presenting and feedback sessions you have just experienced. There are five questions for you to answer. Each of you should write your own responses. When all of you are finished, share your responses with the others in your group. Discuss each question as a group and come up with a consensus answer for each question. One person should be prepared to share your consensus with the whole group.
Debriefing the presenting and feedback sessions: 1. What went well in your presenting and feedback session? 2. What didn’t go as well as it should have? 3. What will you do differently next time to make the process go smoother?
Debriefing your learning:
Look at the Teacher’s Learning Record Rubric. Where are you in the
progression of learning?
What do you need to do differently next time to increase your evidence of
student engagement in 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3? |
Facilitator Instructions : One of the most important parts of this process is that the group thinks about their group process. Debriefing the process will help them develop team collaboration and cooperation. They need to take about five minutes to think about the processing and what went well and what didn’t go well. As a group, they should discuss what was uncomfortable and what they need to do within their group to be sure everyone is comfortable and supported in the process. The second part of the debriefing is for them to look at the rubric we provided in the Evidence Guidelines called Teacher’ s Learning Record Rubric and indicate where they are in the progression of learning and what they need to do to move to the next level of performance.
Debriefing
Now that you have practiced the process in small groups, each team needs to debrief the group presenting and feedback session they have just experienced.
First think and write yourself. Then share with the group and make one group list.
When you have finished the individual group discussions, it is critical to have the whole group discussion so everyone hears each other.
Debriefing the presenting and feedback sessions:
1. What went well in your presenting and feedback session?
2. What didn’t go as well as it should have?
3. What will you do differently next time to make the process go smoother?
Debriefing your learning:
Look at the Teacher’s Learning Record Rubric. Where are you in the progression of learning?
What do you need to do differently next time to increase your evidence of student engagement in 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3?
Facilitator Instructions : Now we are ready to prepare for the next session. Make sure everyone has the new Evidence Worksheet. Their students have had the opportunity to practice these Descriptions of Practice many times over the past couple of months. It should not be difficult to gather evidence on all three.
Facilitator Notes: The participants may not need a review of how to fill out the rest of the Evidence Worksheet. It is here in case they do. If not, skip the next two slides and go on to Slide 84.
Optional to play slide 82-83.
82 |
Evidence Worksheet
|
Take out a new Evidence Worksheet. At the top of the page it tells us that our
assignment next time is for each person to bring in evidence of three
Descriptions of Practice in Student Voice, demonstrating that All Students are
engaged in the Descriptions of Practice and they have practiced them in
Multiple Contexts. We also need to see that the students are practicing these
Descriptions of Practice Over Time. During this training you have brought in
many evidences of the students engaged in these Descriptions of Practice. So
bring in several past evidences to show Over Time.
To demonstrate student mastery, have the students practice the Descriptions of
Practice in a different context than they have in the past so your evidence can
be in Multiple Contexts. What does Multiple Contexts mean? This may be a
different content area, or a different kind of learning target within the same
content area. The idea is that students can apply the Descriptions of Practice
in more than one kind of learning experience.
The audience needs to see the degree to which the students are experiencing the
Descriptions of Practice. The degree to which the Descriptions of Practice
are happening is what makes the evidence convincing. |
83 |
Evidence Planning Questions
The Evidence Worksheet comes up in sections as each section is explained. |
The Evidence Worksheet is structured to help you plan your evidence and prepare
your presentation of that evidence.
First describe what Descriptions of Practice are demonstrated in your evidence.
During your presentation, feel free to tell us how good you feel the evidence
is or isn’t and why – this is part of your analysis. The purpose of
the presentation is for you to analyze for your teammates where you are in
your ability to gather the evidence and for them to understand the evidence you
have brought in. In that way, they can gear their comments and tailor their
suggestions to what you might not already know. These discussions are intended
to help you learn – so ask for the help you feel you need so you get the
suggestions you want and need.
The second section of the Evidence Worksheet asks you to describe the context
of the lesson you are using for evidence collection. What is the long term
learning goal? What is the learning target? Remember, the learning target is
what you want the students to know and be able to do as a result of
participating in today’s learning experience. The learning target may be
a culminating learning target where students apply several previous targets.
The third section lists a series of questions that will both guide you in your
evidence collection and help you analyze the evidence you are bringing in for
your teammates. You may choose any content or lesson that you want.
The fourth section asks you to think about how your evidence is using the
elements of quality evidence. Remember your Evidence Guidelines examples.
OK – now you are ready to plan for the next session. Discuss a lesson
that you will be doing in the near future with your teammates and help each
other plan the evidence you could bring in next time. Before you leave this
session, it is our intent that you tried to fill out the Evidence Worksheet so
you are clear on what your evidence will look like. We suggest you work with
the students multiple times between this session and next. The evidence you
bring in may be different than the lesson you plan today. The purpose of
working with your team today is to be sure you understand the process of
planning your evidence. It is perfectly fine to change your decision if you
want to. The important thing is that you know how to use the planning sheet to
get the exact kind of evidence we are looking for. |
Facilitator Instructions: This time encourage the participants to gather their evidence in a different context than they have been in the past. Different context has several connotations: it can be a different content area; or it can be a different application within the same content area. For example: If it were a high school math class, a different content area would not be appropriate; however, one time the evidence can be gathered from homework, another time from a group learning project, preparation for a test, or an independent work session. Different context means gather the evidence in a different learning context than you have previously used.
Play slide 84.
84 |
Outcome Session V This session we practiced using:
Evidence Worksheet - next session you will come with this ready to present your evidence.
Evidence Feedback Worksheet
Fade to:
Next session you will bring in evidence :
|
This session we continued practicing the process of working in learning
communities to help each other learn how to gather, present, and give feedback
on student evidence. We practiced processing student evidence in a way that
will help us learn how to work collaboratively to support the learning process
school-wide.
We practiced using the Evidence Worksheet for our presentation of the evidence
we brought in.
Remember that you need to come to the next session with an Evidence Worksheet
all filled out for the evidence you will be presenting. Always come prepared
to analyze your evidence for your team. We will not be taking time to fill
these out in class. The assignment next time is for each person to bring in
evidence of three Descriptions of Practice in Student Voice, demonstrating that
All Students are engaged in the Descriptions of Practice and they have
practiced them in Multiple Contexts. We also need to see that the students are
practicing these Descriptions of Practice Over Time.
Practice working with your students on these Descriptions of Practice several
times, making sure to engage them in practicing the Descriptions of Practice in
a different context, between this session and the next. Bring in your best
evidence, not your only attempt. The more you practice between sessions, the
more meaningful the learning will be for you and your students. Everyone in
your group will bring in evidence. Remember, it is impossible to have the
discussions without evidence – check in with each other before the next
session to make sure everyone is coming with evidence.
Each session we will follow the same process as we used today and each session
we will become more and more skilled in the process. Thank you for your
participation today and next time you will see how much easier the process is
becoming. |
Facilitator Notes:
FEEDBACK WORKSHEET Session V
I. LISTEN TO THE ANALYSIS
II. LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE
– Ask clarifying questions.
Clarification Questions:
III. W RITE FEEDBACK: Analyze the evidence in writing – silently.
What was CREDIBLE about the evidence? Verify the Element of Quality Evidence is present:
You are gathering evidence of these
DESCRIPTIONS OF PRACTICE for Criterion 1d |
Evidence focus
|
Personalizing student behaviors
your evidence demonstrates:
|
1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets Notes from teacher presentation: | Students describe
(1) their learning targets (2) why the learning is important to them (3) how they will demonstrate they have reached them Notes from student evidence:
|
1d2 Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance
Notes from teacher presentation: |
Students (1)articulate the progression of steps to reach the learning targets (2) identify, on their own, where they are in that progression (3) describe what they need to do to move to the next level of performance Notes from student evidence:
|
1d3 Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation,
acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate Notes from teacher presentation: |
Students are (1) aware of the options to get support and access appropriate help, when needed (2) in their daily work, consistently utilizing the resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as is appropriate Notes from student evidence:
|
Is the shared evidence in student voice ? Comments/feedback:
Does the evidence demonstrate All Students? Comments/feedback:
IV. W HAT DO YOU NEED TO SEE FOR THE EVIDENCE TO BE MORE CONVINCING?
Each member, in turn, gives the feedback to the presenter verbally. “What I need to see to be more convinced…” Make specific positive suggestions for improvement.
V. What “STRETCH” suggestions can you offer?
Possible Stretch Suggestions for 1d3:
EVIDENCE WORKSHEET for SESSION VI
Your evidence this session is of: D ESCRIPTIONS OF P RACTICE 1 D1 , 1d2 and 1d3 ,
in Student Voice, demonstrating ALL Students are engaged in the Descriptions of Practice,
practiced in Multiple Contexts, and Over Time.
I. T ELL US WHAT YOUR EVIDENCE IS DEMONSTRATING:
You are gathering evidence of these
DESCRIPTIONS OF PRACTICE for Criterion 1d |
Evidence focus
|
Personalizing student behaviors
your evidence will demonstrate:
|
1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets | Students describe
(1) their learning targets (2) why the learning is important to them (3) how they will demonstrate they have reached them |
1d2 Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance | Students
(1)articulate the progression of steps to reach the learning targets (2) identify, on their own, where they are in that progression (3) describe what they need to do to move to the next level of performance |
1d3 Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation,
acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate |
Students are (1) aware of the options to get support and access appropriate help, when needed (2) in their daily work, consistently utilizing the resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as is appropriate |
II. T ELL US THE CONTEXT OF THE EVIDENCE:
Culminating Learning Target
III. A NALYZE FOR US THE SPECIFICS OF YOUR D ESCRIPTIONS OF P RACTICE :
For this lesson, the learning targets I want students to know are: (Indicate type of target: Content, Strategies, Thinking Development, Procedural, Investigative/Inquiry or Reflective) …
These learning targets are important and relevant to the students because…
The students will demonstrate how they will know they have reached the targets by…
The students will know the progression of learning to reach this target (This is not the directions to complete the assignment; it is the list of things they need to learn to master the target learning) by…
The students will tell us where they are in that progression by…
How will the students tell us what resources they are accessing if they either haven’t learned what is required or need to go beyond what is required?
IV. a) A NALYZE FOR US HOW THIS EVIDENCE IS IN S TUDENT V OICE….
VII. R EFLECT : What do you feel you could do next time to make your evidence stronger or to provide stronger Descriptions of Practice for your students?
S ESSION VI
Learning Target: a) Participate in professional discussions about evidence of student learning; b) give valuable stretch suggestions.
You need to demonstrate : how to present, give feedback, and stretch suggestions using THREE Descriptions of Practice, in Student Voice, All Students, practiced in Multiple Contexts, demonstrating Over Time.
Approximate time: 3 hours
Materials needed:
Facilitator Notes : This session can be repeated over and over as time in the year permits to give more practice in gathering evidence. At this point in the training the participants know the protocols for the discussions and just need as much practice as possible to develop their confidence.
Facilitator Instructions : In the middle of the table place a pile of Evidence Feedback Worksheets. To make sure you have enough, for each team multiply the number of participants times number on each team, minus one, or use five if you don’t know. That will be the number of worksheets needed for the session (example: 25 participants total with five people on each team 25 X 4 = 100 worksheets). Play slide 85.
Slide # |
Slide Script
|
Narrative on slide |
85a |
Session VI: Learning and Practicing How to Gather Quality Evidence
Descriptions of Practice personalize student learning.
We can now begin to gather quality evidence for the culminating seminar.
Continuum chart
See below |
Today is our last practice presentation and feedback session. We now
understand that the evidence is demonstrating that students are experiencing
the Descriptions of Practice that personalize student learning. We are
developing our ability to work collaboratively and cooperatively with our
colleagues.
At the end of today we will examine our evidence and decide how many of the Descriptions of Practice this evidence accounts for. You will be ready to gather evidence of the Descriptions of Practice to present at your culminating seminar.
|
85b
|
You have arrived today with evidence of three Descriptions of Practice, in
Student Voice, demonstrating that All Students are engaged in the Descriptions
of Practice and they have practiced them in multiple contexts Over Time. This
time you had a pretty good idea of what your evidence needed to look like and
what to expect today. You are beginning to feel more confident about your
evidence and know how to present it well to the team. Your skills are
developing. Your ability to give meaningful feedback is also developing, and
you are feeling more confident about how to give good feedback to your
teammates to make their evidence stronger. You are feeling more comfortable
about the process.
You can see by the continuum diagram how much your skills have grown. Today you will practice making your presentation and feedback session very concise. We will complete the entire process in 30 minutes. After today, we will be ready to share our evidence and discuss student learning as a regular part of our staff meetings. We will be discussing how to make this happen. First let’ ;s review quickly what we need to do to have a quality presentation and feedback session. |
Continuum Chart
Beginning – III |
Practicing - IV |
Practicing- V |
Mastery - VI |
|
|
|
|
Facilitator Instructions : Stop and discuss the chart on the screen. We are now becoming quite proficient with the process. They should focus on making their presentations and feedback comments very concise. Point out to them how far they have come in a very short period of time. The process is getting easier. We now can make our presentation and feedback very concise. We also are becoming very proficient at giving “STRETCH” comments. You also need to point out to them that the evidence they have collected during all the sessions is their evidence of Over Time.
Facilitator Instructions : Make a grid on a white board that has five columns. At the top of each column put All Descriptions of Practice, Student Voice, Multiple Contexts, All Students and Over Time. Ask them to fill in the attributes of quality evidence (not examples of evidence, but attributes that make it quality evidence). Do in groups and then have each group read their attributes. Use this list when doing feedback session.
All Descriptions of Practice |
Student Voice
|
All Students |
Multiple Contexts |
Over Time |
|
This is not a handout – it is for you the facilitator only
All Descriptions of Practice
|
Student Voice |
All Students |
Multiple Contexts |
Over Time |
|
|
|
|
|
Non example: | Non example: | Non example: | Non example: | Non example: |
|
|
|
|
|
Facilitator Instructions: I N OUR FEEDBACK SESSIONS EVERYONE’S LEARNING TARGET IS TO GIVE VALUABLE “STRETCH” SUGGESTIONS. Ask them to refer to their Evidence Guidelines for ideas. They should use the pages detailing 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3. One great way to give “ stretch” suggestions is to use a different kind of learning target, or to take the learning deeper with “depth” suggestions. They can also use Resource #1 Suggestions for Embedding 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3 as well as the Teacher’s Learning Rubrics for ideas. In the feedback sessions, instruct them that it is mandatory for everyone to come up with “stretch” suggestions.
Facilitator Notes: AT THIS STAGE OF THE TRAINING IF YOU WISH TO SIMPLY HAND OUT THE COACHING ROLES AND RANDOMLY ASK THE PERSON’S HAVING EACH ROLE TO REVIEW WHAT THEY ARE TO DO – THAT WILL BE ENOUGH OF AN INTRODUCTION TO THE PROCESS. If you feel they need to have a review of the Evidence Worksheet and Feedback form, Slides 86-87 are included for that review.
Facilitator Instructions: Make sure everyone takes a feedback form.
Optional to play slides 86-87.
86 |
Building Your Understanding Activity #6a:
Evidence Worksheet
|
Each member of the team has come today with their Evidence Worksheet filled
out. This form is for the presenter to analyze the evidence they are going to
present to the team. Let’s review how to use this form:
First, you tell the team the THREE Descriptions of Practice your evidence is
demonstrating and the specific student behaviors they will see in the evidence
you brought in today. Second, place your evidence in the big picture context
for the student learning.
Third, analyze your evidence using the series of questions. You may always tell
us how good you feel the evidence is or isn’t and why.
Fourth, describe in what way you feel this is good evidence of Student Voice,
how the evidence demonstrates ALL Students, how the evidence is demonstrated in
Multiple Contexts, as well as how the evidence demonstrates the students
engaged in the Descriptions of Practice Over Time.
Teammates will ask clarifying questions about the evidence. |
87a |
Evidence Feedback Worksheet
Evidence Feedback Worksheet
|
Let’s review the Evidence Feedback form. Remember, the purpose of giving
feedback is to help one another do a better job of gathering and then
presenting evidence next time. There are two important things to remember in
order that the giving of feedback builds trust and the ability to work
collaboratively. Tell the presenter what was convincing and strong about the
evidence. Then, if you are saying that the evidence didn’t convince you,
you must give the presenter concrete ideas for what you would need to see in
order to be convinced. We are not here to criticize, so we do not point out
what we didn’t like – we do tell them what can be added to make it
stronger.
|
87b |
The first step on the form has the Descriptions of Practice. Everyone on the
team has a blank Feedback Worksheet for each presenter. As the presenter
explains how the evidence demonstrates in what way the students are engaged in
the Descriptions of Practice and how the evidence demonstrates Quality
Evidence, you may circle the student behaviors that you will look for in the
evidence as the presenter does his or her analysis for you.
Then the presenter will share the actual evidence. Up to this point, we have
not seen the evidence. As we view the evidence, we note what the presenter
says we should see in the evidence. The presenter will then show us the
evidence. We ask any questions to make sure we understand the evidence.
At the conclusion of the evidence presentation, before we begin our group
discussion, everyone takes time to write out their individual own thoughts
about the quality of the evidence. Each person writes what they thought was
credible about the evidence and what they need to see to be more convinced.
The sheet guides you to frame all your responses so that you are not
criticizing the evidence but instead giving the presenter ideas of what they
could do to make the evidence stronger.
When everyone has recorded their own thoughts, each team member takes turns
reading what they wrote to the presenter. Only read what you actually wrote.
Remember to first tell them what was credible and strong. Then if you were not
convinced, you begin by saying, “what I would need to see to more
convinced is…” and follow with your suggestion. Only say what more
needs to happen; do not justify your suggestions by saying what didn’t
happen. For example: I really liked that you used journals for Student Voice.
What I would need to see to be more convinced is the students responding to a
question like…
It is always more comfortable just to tell teammates that you think what they
did was great, and for sure you want to do this when it is appropriate –
but in order for them to learn, they need to get additional ideas. We call
these “STRETCH” suggestions. It is an important part of your
learning, as well as theirs, that you think of things they can try that are
new. Remember, giving feedback is about helping each other learn how to make
the evidence stronger – it is about helping each other grow and learn.
After each person gives their feedback, the others in the group also give their
opinions on the feedback that was given. New suggestions will occur as each
member of the team takes his or her turn. | |
88 |
Building Understanding Activity #6b:
Presenter reflects on the feedback – articulate what you learned from the team |
OK – now we are ready to begin to practice this process.
Make sure we do not have more than three people in each group. Each person
will have five minutes to do their presentation of the evidence and for the
group to ask clarifying questions. The feedback session will also take five
minutes. Take just one minute to write your comments. Each teammate will not
take more than one minute to share their comments. The final minute is for the
presenter to tell the group what they gained from their comments that he or
she will use next time to have stronger evidence. |
Building Your Understanding Activity #6b:
Facilitator Instructions : Remember to review the coaching roles so the sharing sessions go smoothly and assure a climate of trust is built. These are the coaching roles: Presentation Coach, Feedback Coach, and Timer. Ask the participants to take the envelope with the roles from the center of the table and distribute each role with three members. Then ask the presentation coach at each table to raise their hands. Select one to read what they will do to coach the others on the team. Repeat for each role. Once the roles have been reviewed, they are ready to begin their sharing sessions.
Everyone was supposed to come to this session with one piece of evidence for THREE Descriptions of Practice in Student Voice demonstrating All Students are engaged in the Descriptions of Practice. The examples will now be fairly strong. They must complete their presentation and feedback session within 30 minutes. Make sure there are not more than three people in each group.
When the session is over, you are ready for the final debriefing.
At this stage of the training you do not need to play the slide. Simply remind them of the process: each person fills out individually, then share with the group, collaborate on what you will report to the whole group. Slide 89 is here in the event you feel it is appropriate to play it.
89
| Debriefing
Debriefing the presenting and feedback sessions:
Debriefing your learning:
Look at the Teacher’s Learning Record Rubric. Where are you in the
progression of learning?
What do you need to do differently next time to increase your evidence of
student engagement in 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3? |
Debriefing Now that you have practiced the process in small groups, each team needs to debrief the presenting and feedback sessions you have just experienced. There are five questions for you to answer. Each of you should write your own responses. When all of you are finished, share your responses with the others in your group. Discuss each question as a group and come up with a consensus answer for each question. One person should be prepared to share your consensus with the whole group.
Debriefing the presenting and feedback sessions: 1. What went well in your presenting and feedback session? 2. What didn’t go as well as it should have? 3. What will you do differently next time to make the process go smoother?
Debriefing your learning:
Look at the Teacher’s Learning Record Rubric. Where are you in the
progression of learning?
What do you need to do differently next time to increase your evidence of
student engagement in 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3?
|
Facilitator Instructions : At this point what we want to spend time doing is reflecting on our evidence and assessing how many of the Descriptions of Practice it is actually good evidence for. It would be good to have them write up a reflection where they say what in the evidence is good quality evidence for which Descriptions of Practice.
When they have finished this reflection, which of the Descriptions of Practice are not shown, in a quality way, in the evidence you just shared?
Make a plan to collect evidence for the remaining Descriptions of Practice. Make it very clear that they should be able to demonstrate multiple Descriptions of Practice in a single piece of evidence. All the Descriptions of Practice interact with one another; they are not isolated student behaviors. We are including a planning sheet for your remaining evidences.
Debriefing
Now that you have practiced the process in small groups, each team needs to debrief the group presenting and feedback session they have just experienced.
First think and write yourself. Then share with the group and make one group list.
When you have finished the individual group discussions, it is critical to have the whole group discussion so everyone hears each other.
Debriefing the presenting and feedback sessions:
1. What went well in your presenting and feedback session?
2. What didn’t go as well as it should have?
3. What will you do differently next time to make the process go smoother?
Debriefing your learning:
Look at the Teacher’s Learning Record Rubric. Where are you in the progression of learning?
What do you need to do differently next time to increase your evidence of student engagement in 1d1, 1d2, and 1d3?
FEEDBACK WORKSHEET Session VI
I. L ISTEN TO THE ANALYSIS
II. LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE
– Ask clarifying questions.
Sample Clarification Questions:
III. W RITE FEEDBACK: Analyze the evidence in writing – silently.
What was CREDIBLE about the evidence? Verify the Element of Quality Evidence is present:
You are gathering evidence of these
DESCRIPTIONS OF PRACTICE for Criterion 1d |
Evidence focus
|
Personalizing student behaviors
your evidence demonstrates:
|
1d1 Students can articulate the required learning targets Notes from teacher presentation: | Students describe
(1) their learning targets (2) why the learning is important to them (3) how they will demonstrate they have reached them Notes from student evidence:
|
1d2 Students know what is needed to move to the next level of performance
Notes from teacher presentation: |
Students (1)articulate the progression of steps to reach the learning targets (2) identify, on their own, where they are in that progression (3) describe what they need to do to move to the next level of performance Notes from student evidence:
|
1d3 Students are aware of and utilize resources for assistance, remediation,
acceleration, or enrichment, as appropriate Notes from teacher presentation: |
Students are (1) aware of the options to get support and access appropriate help, when needed (2) in their daily work, consistently utilizing the resources for assistance, remediation, acceleration, or enrichment, as is appropriate Notes from student evidence:
|
Is the shared evidence in Student Voice ? Comments/feedback:
Is the shared evidence demonstrating All Students? Comments/feedback:
Is the shared evidence demonstrating Multiple Contents? Comments/feedback:
Is the shared evidence demonstrating Over Time? Comments/feedback:
IV. W HAT DO YOU NEED TO SEE FOR THE EVIDENCE TO BE MORE CONVINCING?
Each member, in turn, gives the feedback to the presenter verbally. “What I need to see to be more convinced…” Make specific positive suggestions for improvement.
EVIDENCE WORKSHEET – Culminating Seminar
I. T ELL US WHAT YOUR EVIDENCE IS DEMONSTRATING:
You are gathering evidence of these
DESCRIPTIONS OF PRACTICE for Criterion 1d |
List Descriptions of Practice this evidence demonstrates |
Personalizing student behaviors
your evidence demonstrates:
|
| |
|
II. T ELL US THE CONTEXT OF THE EVIDENCE:
III. A NALYZE FOR US H OW THIS IS Q UALITY E VIDENCE: (A good resource for what the evidence should demonstrate is the Art and Science of Professional Teaching by Marilyn Simpson):
IV. YOU WILL SHARE THE EVIDENCE WITH YOUR TEAM AND ANSWER ANY CLARIFYING QUESTIONS THEY MAY HAVE.
V. Y OUR TEAM WILL GIVE YOU F EEDBACK: Receive Feedback verbally and in writing on the Convincing and Credible nature of your evidence. Team members will give you “STRETCH” suggestions as well. Each team member will first give you their feedback verbally and then give you their written comments.
VI. R EFLECT : What do you feel you could do next time to make your evidence stronger or to provide stronger Descriptions of Practice for your students?
S ESSION I
Learning Targets:
Understand a) your own belief about how students learn, and 2) how that belief is aligned with our state reform efforts.
You need to demonstrate:
your own emerging theory of intellectual development;
understanding of how that belief affects your instructional and classroom management decisions.
S ESSION II
Learning Targets:
Be able to gather evidence of 1d1 in Student Voice.
You need to demonstrate:
understanding of attributes of quality evidence;
ability to use the Evidence Guidelines as a resource;
ability to plan evidence of 1d1 in Student Voice.
SESSION III
Learning Targets:
Improve your evidence and help improve others’ evidence.
You need to demonstrate:
how to give a good presentation;
ability to analyze the evidence;
use the protocols to give feedback;
and plan to gather evidence of 1d1 and 1d2 in Student Voice.
S ESSION IV
Learning Target:
Improve your evidence of 1d2.
You need to demonstrate: ability to participate in the presentation and feedback session;
give stretch suggestions for 1d2;
and plan evidence for
1d1, 1d2, and 1d3
in Student Voice, and All Students.
S ESSION V
Learning Target:
Improve your evidence of 1d3.
You need to demonstrate: ability to participate in the presentation and feedback session;
give stretch suggestions for 1d3;
plan evidence for THREE Descriptions of Practice
in Student Voice, All Students, in Multiple Contexts,
Over Time.
S ESSION VI
Learning Target:
a) Participate in professional discussions about evidence of student learning ; b) give valuable stretch suggestions.
You need to demonstrate: how to present, give feedback, and stretch suggestions using THREE Descriptions of Practice, in Student Voice, All Students, in Multiple Contexts, and Over Time.
76