![]() | English 4 Semester 1 Credit Recovery Opportunity Springboard |
Planning and Pre-Writing | ·
Which of the two stories resonates with you on a personal level?
· What questions are asked about a text when it is read from a feminist perspective? · How will you collect your initial ideas to create a focus on feminist perspective of these stories? (e.g., brainstorming, a graphic organizer)? · How will you determine which ideas should go into your draft? · Who is the audience for your essay? How much do you think this audience knows about feminist issues and feminist criticism? |
Drafting | ·
How much summary is necessary to introduce the story to the audience?
· How can you summarize and paraphrase the text in a way that keeps the author’s original meaning? · How will you use both evidence from the text and your own words to support your feminist perspective? · How can you make sure that your writing is clear and engaging to the reader (e.g., using appeals, sentence variety, transitions between ideas)? |
Evaluating and Revising | ·
How can you determine if your syntax and use of language helps the reader understand your feminist analysis?
· How will you determine if your sentence structure and transitions present your ideas in the best way? · How can you use the Scoring Guide to help evaluate your draft and guide your revision? |
Editing and Publishing | ·
How will you check for grammatical and technical accuracy?
· What tools are available to you to create a technically sound text (e.g., dictionary or format guide, spell check)? |
· Analyze the characteristics of argumentative writing, and evaluate a writer’s use of reasoning and evidence to support a claim.
· Use knowledge of the writing process to plan, write, revise, and edit an argumentative essay that supports claims with valid reasoning and relevant evidence.
· Introduce and develop claims and counterclaims effectively, anticipating the knowledge, concerns, values, and possible biases of the audience.
· Use an organizational structure and transitional words, phrases, and clauses that make the relationships between claims, counterclaims, reasons, and evidence clear and cohesive.
· Edit drafts to conform to standard English conventions.
· Participate collaboratively during discussions by contributing relevant ideas and information, building on others’ ideas, and moving the discussion forward with thoughtful questions and responses.
1. The internet is a fantastic place to find and respond to the views of people from all walks of life. How familiar are you with public message boards, discussion threads, or online debates? What topics or comments inspire you to respond? Describe your prior experience engaging in online debate or responding to the comments of others. ?
· Highlight the lines that are clearly crafted as responses to opposing sentiments.
· Circle each repetition of the rhetorical question, “Ain’t I a woman?”
2. Reread the lines that you highlighted. Then create a “reverse outline” of the three objections made to giving women the right to vote. Then outline the use of logic in response to the objections.
Objection 1:
Response:
Objection 2:
Response
Objection 3:
Response
3. What language in the speech is particularly powerful or convincing?
a) Create a reverse outline of the text to be sure that you understand the important points.
b) Brainstorm possible responses and evidence that could be used to argue against this position.
c) Conduct research to augment your bank of evidence. Be mindful of selecting credible, unbiased, accurate sources of relevant, valid, and reliable evidence.
d) Generate an outline for your response.
e) Determine a tone and persona to promote in the response.
f) Draft an introduction or opening, body paragraphs, and a conclusion or closing.
g) Remember to include transitions within and between paragraphs.
h) Review your work and revise as necessary. Look for opportunities to exploit rhetorical appeals and promote a deliberate persona.
i) Edit for mistakes in spelling, punctuation, grammar, etc., and produce a final draft.
Claims | Potential Rebuttals and Evidence that Could be Employed to Respond to this Claim |
| |
| |
|
· Relevant: Is the information timely and closely tied to the rebuttal?
· Valid: Does the information appear to be legitimate? In what ways could this evidence be used to support the ideas generated for response?
· Reliable: Are the author’s name and qualifications clearly identified? Is the information from a respected source or publication?