Step 1
| Step 2
| Step 3
| Step 4
Evaluate the character’s decisions: |
What is the action the character takes?
(Text based) | What were the consequences?
(Text based and/or inferred information) | Why did the character
act in this way? (Text based and/or inferred information) | What flaws were there in the character’s thinking?
Support your answer. | What logical reasons support the choices made?
Support your answer. | Do you agree or disagree with the characters reasoning?
Support your answer. | Does the character’s treatment of the other characters seem fair?
Why or why not? |
| 1. Frantizek carries poem on his person to spread underground literature 2. He ran for the loft 3. He feigned dead 4. He is the only one who decides not to escape over the wall |
1. He is sentenced to Gestapo prison for 3 years; he is transferred to Rodogoszcz Polish political prisoners camp when Russians invade 2. He was shot/grazed and fell down 3. passed the test of pretense – stayed 4. He is the only one who stays alive 4. He is saved at the end of the war |
1. He opposed Hitler’s actions 2. He was told to do so (?) 3. So he could stay alive by pretending he was dead 4. He saw and heard others die during the escape attempts | 1. He did not realize he would get caught 4. He thought he might make it 2. He assumed he had no other choice 3. He did not know they would search the bodies by using flashlights for eye test and probing 4. They could have found him |
1. He did not care; he felt it was worth it to voice his opposition to Hitler 2. The loft could be a safe destination 2. He might be fast 3. The SS did not mess with the bodies at the time 4. The ones that tried t escape were shot | Opinion:
I agree/disagree… 1. Agree Evidence: Down with Hitler and racism 2. Agree Evidence: The ss shoots those who are disloyal (is this in the text? 3. Agree Evidence: 3. It worked for awhile; he did not get shot at again 4. Agree Evidence: The others were shot and did not survive the war 5. Disagree Evidence: Just get it over with | Judgment:
Yes, it’s fair/ No, it’s not fair… 1. Fair Evidence: Hitler was a racist (ex from text ?) 2. NA 3. NA 4. Not fair Evidence: Hw abandoned the others 5. Fair Evidence: The theory of “everyone for themself” |
Step 1
| Step 2
| Step 3
| Step 4 Evaluate the character’s decisions:
|
What is the action the character takes?
(Text based) | What were the consequences?
(Text based and/or inferred information) | Why did the character
act in this way? (Text based and/or inferred information) | What flaws were there in the character’s thinking?
Support your answer. | What logical reasons support the choices made?
Support your answer. | Do you agree or disagree with the characters reasoning?
Support your answer. | Does the character’s treatment of the other characters seem fair?
Why or why not? |
| | More Evidence:
| More Evidence:
|
| Do what it takes to survive unbelievingly hard situations. |
| Stand up for what you believe in (the lifeskill of Courage) |
| Luck: You just never know – you might get lucky |
| I would give up because I would probably not get out anyway. |
| I would close myself of to any emotions because ---------- ??????? |
| I would do what I was told to do because ---------?????????? |
| I would not follow directions because they will shoot me anyway. |